Commit 4366dd72 authored by Harald Freudenberger's avatar Harald Freudenberger Committed by Vasily Gorbik

s390/zcrypt: fix wrong format specifications

Fixes 5 wrong format specification findings found by the
kernel test robot in ap_queue.c:

warning: format specifies type 'unsigned char' but the argument has type 'int' [-Wformat]
                               __func__, status.response_code,
Signed-off-by: default avatarHarald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 2ea2a609 ("s390/ap: add error response code field for ap queue devices")
Signed-off-by: default avatarVasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
parent b61e1f32
...@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static enum ap_sm_wait ap_sm_read(struct ap_queue *aq) ...@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static enum ap_sm_wait ap_sm_read(struct ap_queue *aq)
default: default:
aq->dev_state = AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR; aq->dev_state = AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR;
aq->last_err_rc = status.response_code; aq->last_err_rc = status.response_code;
AP_DBF_WARN("%s RC 0x%02hhx on 0x%02x.%04x -> AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR\n", AP_DBF_WARN("%s RC 0x%02x on 0x%02x.%04x -> AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR\n",
__func__, status.response_code, __func__, status.response_code,
AP_QID_CARD(aq->qid), AP_QID_QUEUE(aq->qid)); AP_QID_CARD(aq->qid), AP_QID_QUEUE(aq->qid));
return AP_SM_WAIT_NONE; return AP_SM_WAIT_NONE;
...@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static enum ap_sm_wait ap_sm_write(struct ap_queue *aq) ...@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static enum ap_sm_wait ap_sm_write(struct ap_queue *aq)
default: default:
aq->dev_state = AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR; aq->dev_state = AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR;
aq->last_err_rc = status.response_code; aq->last_err_rc = status.response_code;
AP_DBF_WARN("%s RC 0x%02hhx on 0x%02x.%04x -> AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR\n", AP_DBF_WARN("%s RC 0x%02x on 0x%02x.%04x -> AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR\n",
__func__, status.response_code, __func__, status.response_code,
AP_QID_CARD(aq->qid), AP_QID_QUEUE(aq->qid)); AP_QID_CARD(aq->qid), AP_QID_QUEUE(aq->qid));
return AP_SM_WAIT_NONE; return AP_SM_WAIT_NONE;
...@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static enum ap_sm_wait ap_sm_reset(struct ap_queue *aq) ...@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static enum ap_sm_wait ap_sm_reset(struct ap_queue *aq)
default: default:
aq->dev_state = AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR; aq->dev_state = AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR;
aq->last_err_rc = status.response_code; aq->last_err_rc = status.response_code;
AP_DBF_WARN("%s RC 0x%02hhx on 0x%02x.%04x -> AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR\n", AP_DBF_WARN("%s RC 0x%02x on 0x%02x.%04x -> AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR\n",
__func__, status.response_code, __func__, status.response_code,
AP_QID_CARD(aq->qid), AP_QID_QUEUE(aq->qid)); AP_QID_CARD(aq->qid), AP_QID_QUEUE(aq->qid));
return AP_SM_WAIT_NONE; return AP_SM_WAIT_NONE;
...@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static enum ap_sm_wait ap_sm_reset_wait(struct ap_queue *aq) ...@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static enum ap_sm_wait ap_sm_reset_wait(struct ap_queue *aq)
default: default:
aq->dev_state = AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR; aq->dev_state = AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR;
aq->last_err_rc = status.response_code; aq->last_err_rc = status.response_code;
AP_DBF_WARN("%s RC 0x%02hhx on 0x%02x.%04x -> AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR\n", AP_DBF_WARN("%s RC 0x%02x on 0x%02x.%04x -> AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR\n",
__func__, status.response_code, __func__, status.response_code,
AP_QID_CARD(aq->qid), AP_QID_QUEUE(aq->qid)); AP_QID_CARD(aq->qid), AP_QID_QUEUE(aq->qid));
return AP_SM_WAIT_NONE; return AP_SM_WAIT_NONE;
...@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static enum ap_sm_wait ap_sm_setirq_wait(struct ap_queue *aq) ...@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static enum ap_sm_wait ap_sm_setirq_wait(struct ap_queue *aq)
default: default:
aq->dev_state = AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR; aq->dev_state = AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR;
aq->last_err_rc = status.response_code; aq->last_err_rc = status.response_code;
AP_DBF_WARN("%s RC 0x%02hhx on 0x%02x.%04x -> AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR\n", AP_DBF_WARN("%s RC 0x%02x on 0x%02x.%04x -> AP_DEV_STATE_ERROR\n",
__func__, status.response_code, __func__, status.response_code,
AP_QID_CARD(aq->qid), AP_QID_QUEUE(aq->qid)); AP_QID_CARD(aq->qid), AP_QID_QUEUE(aq->qid));
return AP_SM_WAIT_NONE; return AP_SM_WAIT_NONE;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment