Commit 440e84a5 authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä

drm/i915: Don't set update_wm_post on g4x+

update_wm_post is meant for pre-g4x only. Don't ever set
it on g4x+.

The only effect of a bogus update_wm_post on g4x+ could
be that we clear the legacy_cursor_update flag in
intel_atomic_commit(). Since legacy_cursor_update is
only set for legacy cursor updates (as the name suggests)
and we only set update_wm_post for a modeset the two
cases should never occur at the same time. But let's
be consistent in setting update_wm_post so we don't
end up confusing so many people.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190206185433.8116-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
parent d6f328bf
......@@ -11063,7 +11063,8 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
int ret;
bool mode_changed = needs_modeset(crtc_state);
if (mode_changed && !crtc_state->active)
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 5 && !IS_G4X(dev_priv) &&
mode_changed && !crtc_state->active)
pipe_config->update_wm_post = true;
if (mode_changed && crtc_state->enable &&
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment