Commit 448ae8ea authored by Liu Ying's avatar Liu Ying Committed by Philipp Zabel

gpu: ipu-v3: Do not wait for DMFC FIFO to clear when disabling DMFC channel

According to basic tests, it looks there is no issue if we don't wait for
DMFC FIFO to clear when disabling DMFC channel.  NXP BSP doesn't do that,
either.  This patch is needed to avoid the annoying warning caused by a
timeout on waiting for the FIFO to clear after we add the new
DRM_PLANE_COMMIT_NO_DISABLE_AFTER_MODESET flag to the imx-drm driver
which changes the procedure to disable display channel slightly.

Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLiu Ying <gnuiyl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPhilipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
parent 2b58e98d
......@@ -123,20 +123,6 @@ int ipu_dmfc_enable_channel(struct dmfc_channel *dmfc)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ipu_dmfc_enable_channel);
static void ipu_dmfc_wait_fifos(struct ipu_dmfc_priv *priv)
{
unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(1000);
while ((readl(priv->base + DMFC_STAT) & 0x02fff000) != 0x02fff000) {
if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
dev_warn(priv->dev,
"Timeout waiting for DMFC FIFOs to clear\n");
break;
}
cpu_relax();
}
}
void ipu_dmfc_disable_channel(struct dmfc_channel *dmfc)
{
struct ipu_dmfc_priv *priv = dmfc->priv;
......@@ -145,10 +131,8 @@ void ipu_dmfc_disable_channel(struct dmfc_channel *dmfc)
priv->use_count--;
if (!priv->use_count) {
ipu_dmfc_wait_fifos(priv);
if (!priv->use_count)
ipu_module_disable(priv->ipu, IPU_CONF_DMFC_EN);
}
if (priv->use_count < 0)
priv->use_count = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment