Commit 4702f991 authored by Kuninori Morimoto's avatar Kuninori Morimoto Committed by Mark Brown

ASoC: soc-core: soc_set_name_prefix(): tidyup loop condition

Current soc_set_name_prefix() for loop is checking both codec_conf
pointer and its number

	for (...; i < card->num_configs && card->codec_conf; ...)

But, if card->num_configs exists but card->codec_conf was NULL,
it is just bug.
This patch cleanups for loop condition.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRanjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarPierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87wob5xbkn.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent eaffeefb
...@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ static void soc_set_name_prefix(struct snd_soc_card *card, ...@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@ static void soc_set_name_prefix(struct snd_soc_card *card,
{ {
int i; int i;
for (i = 0; i < card->num_configs && card->codec_conf; i++) { for (i = 0; i < card->num_configs; i++) {
struct snd_soc_codec_conf *map = &card->codec_conf[i]; struct snd_soc_codec_conf *map = &card->codec_conf[i];
struct device_node *of_node = soc_component_to_node(component); struct device_node *of_node = soc_component_to_node(component);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment