Commit 4d23322a authored by Jiri Olsa's avatar Jiri Olsa Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf hists: Rename hist_entry__add_pair arguments

The current logic is to attach pair to the leader hist_entry.

Arguments of hist_entry__add_pair function were placed the other way
round.. driving me crazy.

I.e. list_add_tail expects (new_node, head).
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1355404152-16523-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent 367c53c0
......@@ -117,10 +117,10 @@ static inline struct hist_entry *hist_entry__next_pair(struct hist_entry *he)
return NULL;
}
static inline void hist_entry__add_pair(struct hist_entry *he,
struct hist_entry *pair)
static inline void hist_entry__add_pair(struct hist_entry *pair,
struct hist_entry *he)
{
list_add_tail(&he->pairs.head, &pair->pairs.node);
list_add_tail(&pair->pairs.node, &he->pairs.head);
}
enum sort_mode {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment