Commit 4dd3fd71 authored by Brian Foster's avatar Brian Foster Committed by Dave Chinner

xfs: don't assert fail on non-async buffers on ioacct decrement

The buffer I/O accounting mechanism tracks async buffers under I/O.  As
an optimization, the buffer I/O count is incremented only once on the
first async I/O for a given hold cycle of a buffer and decremented once
the buffer is released to the LRU (or freed).

xfs_buf_ioacct_dec() has an ASSERT() check for an XBF_ASYNC buffer, but
we have one or two corner cases where a buffer can be submitted for I/O
multiple times via different methods in a single hold cycle. If an async
I/O occurs first, the I/O count is incremented. If a sync I/O occurs
before the hold count drops, XBF_ASYNC is cleared by the time the I/O
count is decremented.

Remove the async assert check from xfs_buf_ioacct_dec() as this is a
perfectly valid scenario. For the purposes of I/O accounting, we really
only care about the buffer async state at I/O submission time.
Discovered-and-analyzed-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
parent 694d0d0b
......@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ xfs_buf_ioacct_dec(
if (!(bp->b_flags & _XBF_IN_FLIGHT))
return;
ASSERT(bp->b_flags & XBF_ASYNC);
bp->b_flags &= ~_XBF_IN_FLIGHT;
percpu_counter_dec(&bp->b_target->bt_io_count);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment