Commit 4e298021 authored by Theodore Ts'o's avatar Theodore Ts'o

ext4: remove unnecessary call to waitqueue_active()

The usage of waitqueue_active() is not necessary, and introduces (I
believe) a hard-to-hit race.
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
parent d73d5046
......@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ static void put_io_page(struct ext4_io_page *io_page)
void ext4_free_io_end(ext4_io_end_t *io)
{
int i;
wait_queue_head_t *wq;
BUG_ON(!io);
if (io->page)
......@@ -78,10 +77,8 @@ void ext4_free_io_end(ext4_io_end_t *io)
for (i = 0; i < io->num_io_pages; i++)
put_io_page(io->pages[i]);
io->num_io_pages = 0;
wq = ext4_ioend_wq(io->inode);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&EXT4_I(io->inode)->i_ioend_count) &&
waitqueue_active(wq))
wake_up_all(wq);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&EXT4_I(io->inode)->i_ioend_count))
wake_up_all(ext4_ioend_wq(io->inode));
kmem_cache_free(io_end_cachep, io);
}
......@@ -96,7 +93,6 @@ int ext4_end_io_nolock(ext4_io_end_t *io)
struct inode *inode = io->inode;
loff_t offset = io->offset;
ssize_t size = io->size;
wait_queue_head_t *wq;
int ret = 0;
ext4_debug("ext4_end_io_nolock: io 0x%p from inode %lu,list->next 0x%p,"
......@@ -121,11 +117,8 @@ int ext4_end_io_nolock(ext4_io_end_t *io)
if (io->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN) {
io->flag &= ~EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
/* Wake up anyone waiting on unwritten extent conversion */
wq = ext4_ioend_wq(io->inode);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten) &&
waitqueue_active(wq)) {
wake_up_all(wq);
}
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten))
wake_up_all(ext4_ioend_wq(io->inode));
}
return ret;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment