Commit 56063306 authored by Heiko Carstens's avatar Heiko Carstens Committed by Martin Schwidefsky

s390/dumpstack: implement and use return_address()

Implement return_address() and use it instead of __builtin_return_address(n).

__builtin_return_address(n) is not guaranteed to work for n > 0,
therefore implement a private return_address() function which walks
the stack frames and returns the proper return address.

This way we get also rid of a compile warning which gcc 6.1 emits and
look like all other architectures.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
parent e18eb2d1
...@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@ ...@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
#define ftrace_return_address(n) __builtin_return_address(n) unsigned long return_address(int depth);
#define ftrace_return_address(n) return_address(n)
void _mcount(void); void _mcount(void);
void ftrace_caller(void); void ftrace_caller(void);
......
...@@ -89,6 +89,30 @@ void dump_trace(dump_trace_func_t func, void *data, struct task_struct *task, ...@@ -89,6 +89,30 @@ void dump_trace(dump_trace_func_t func, void *data, struct task_struct *task,
} }
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dump_trace); EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dump_trace);
struct return_address_data {
unsigned long address;
int depth;
};
static int __return_address(void *data, unsigned long address)
{
struct return_address_data *rd = data;
if (rd->depth--)
return 0;
rd->address = address;
return 1;
}
unsigned long return_address(int depth)
{
struct return_address_data rd = { .depth = depth + 2 };
dump_trace(__return_address, &rd, NULL, current_stack_pointer());
return rd.address;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
static int show_address(void *data, unsigned long address) static int show_address(void *data, unsigned long address)
{ {
printk("([<%016lx>] %pSR)\n", address, (void *)address); printk("([<%016lx>] %pSR)\n", address, (void *)address);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment