Commit 577b1f06 authored by Hans de Goede's avatar Hans de Goede Committed by Sebastian Reichel

power: supply: axp288_charger: Use one notifier_block per extcon cable

Prior to this commit the code was using 1 notifier_block for all
types of charger cable, this is incorrect as the notifier_block
becomes part of a linked-list and now the same notifier_block
is part of 3 linked lists.

This commit fixes this by using a separate nb per extcon cable.

Note this happened to work fine sofar because axp288_charger was the only
listener, so when added to each of the 3 notifier chains, the next pointer
in the nb would be set to 0, so we've 3 heads pointing to the same nb,
with its next pointing to NULL. But as soon as we mix in a second extcon
consumer things will go boom.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
parent 7def63ca
......@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@
#define AXP288_EXTCON_DEV_NAME "axp288_extcon"
#define USB_HOST_EXTCON_DEV_NAME "INT3496:00"
static const unsigned int cable_ids[] =
{ EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP, EXTCON_CHG_USB_CDP, EXTCON_CHG_USB_DCP };
enum {
VBUS_OV_IRQ = 0,
CHARGE_DONE_IRQ,
......@@ -149,7 +152,7 @@ struct axp288_chrg_info {
struct extcon_dev *edev;
bool connected;
enum power_supply_type chg_type;
struct notifier_block nb;
struct notifier_block nb[ARRAY_SIZE(cable_ids)];
struct work_struct work;
} cable;
......@@ -625,14 +628,35 @@ static void axp288_charger_extcon_evt_worker(struct work_struct *work)
power_supply_changed(info->psy_usb);
}
static int axp288_charger_handle_cable_evt(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long event, void *param)
/*
* We need 3 copies of this, because there is no way to find out for which
* cable id we are being called from the passed in arguments; and we must
* have a separate nb for each extcon_register_notifier call.
*/
static int axp288_charger_handle_cable0_evt(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long event, void *param)
{
struct axp288_chrg_info *info =
container_of(nb, struct axp288_chrg_info, cable.nb);
container_of(nb, struct axp288_chrg_info, cable.nb[0]);
schedule_work(&info->cable.work);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
static int axp288_charger_handle_cable1_evt(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long event, void *param)
{
struct axp288_chrg_info *info =
container_of(nb, struct axp288_chrg_info, cable.nb[1]);
schedule_work(&info->cable.work);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
static int axp288_charger_handle_cable2_evt(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long event, void *param)
{
struct axp288_chrg_info *info =
container_of(nb, struct axp288_chrg_info, cable.nb[2]);
schedule_work(&info->cable.work);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
......@@ -766,9 +790,6 @@ static int axp288_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct axp20x_dev *axp20x = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
struct power_supply_config charger_cfg = {};
unsigned int cable_ids[] = { EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP, EXTCON_CHG_USB_CDP,
EXTCON_CHG_USB_DCP };
info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!info)
return -ENOMEM;
......@@ -811,10 +832,12 @@ static int axp288_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Register for extcon notification */
INIT_WORK(&info->cable.work, axp288_charger_extcon_evt_worker);
info->cable.nb.notifier_call = axp288_charger_handle_cable_evt;
info->cable.nb[0].notifier_call = axp288_charger_handle_cable0_evt;
info->cable.nb[1].notifier_call = axp288_charger_handle_cable1_evt;
info->cable.nb[2].notifier_call = axp288_charger_handle_cable2_evt;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cable_ids); i++) {
ret = devm_extcon_register_notifier(dev, info->cable.edev,
cable_ids[i], &info->cable.nb);
cable_ids[i], &info->cable.nb[i]);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to register extcon notifier for %u: %d\n",
cable_ids[i], ret);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment