Commit 589ccd8b authored by Doug Ledford's avatar Doug Ledford

RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix static checker warning

If there is ever any error while creating srq->umem, we return that
error, we don't store it in srq->umem, so any check of srq->umem for
IS_ERR is pointless.  Further, checking udata is unnecessary as
srq->umem is always either NULL or valid, without respect to udata.
Reported-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
parent e7996a9a
......@@ -1314,7 +1314,7 @@ int bnxt_re_destroy_srq(struct ib_srq *ib_srq)
return rc;
}
if (srq->umem && !IS_ERR(srq->umem))
if (srq->umem)
ib_umem_release(srq->umem);
kfree(srq);
atomic_dec(&rdev->srq_count);
......@@ -1430,11 +1430,8 @@ struct ib_srq *bnxt_re_create_srq(struct ib_pd *ib_pd,
return &srq->ib_srq;
fail:
if (udata && srq->umem && !IS_ERR(srq->umem)) {
if (srq->umem)
ib_umem_release(srq->umem);
srq->umem = NULL;
}
kfree(srq);
exit:
return ERR_PTR(rc);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment