Commit 6330a30a authored by Vegard Nossum's avatar Vegard Nossum Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86: break mutual header inclusion

This breaks up the mutual inclusion between headers ptrace.h and vm86.h
by moving some small part of vm86.h which is needed by ptrace.h into
processor-flags.h.

We also try to move #include lines to the top.

This has been compile tested on x86_32 and x86_64 defconfig, and run
through 'make headers_check'.

Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 83bea8e1
......@@ -88,4 +88,10 @@
#define CX86_ARR_BASE 0xc4
#define CX86_RCR_BASE 0xdc
#ifdef CONFIG_VM86
#define X86_VM_MASK X86_EFLAGS_VM
#else
#define X86_VM_MASK 0 /* No VM86 support */
#endif
#endif /* __ASM_I386_PROCESSOR_FLAGS_H */
......@@ -3,7 +3,12 @@
#include <linux/compiler.h> /* For __user */
#include <asm/ptrace-abi.h>
#include <asm/processor-flags.h>
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#include <asm/ds.h> /* the DS BTS struct is used for ptrace too */
#include <asm/segment.h>
#endif
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
......@@ -55,9 +60,6 @@ struct pt_regs {
unsigned long ss;
};
#include <asm/vm86.h>
#include <asm/segment.h>
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#else /* __i386__ */
......
......@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ struct vm86plus_info_struct {
unsigned long is_vm86pus:1; /* for vm86 internal use */
unsigned char vm86dbg_intxxtab[32]; /* for debugger */
};
struct vm86plus_struct {
struct vm86_regs regs;
unsigned long flags;
......@@ -128,11 +127,7 @@ struct vm86plus_struct {
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#ifdef CONFIG_VM86
#define X86_VM_MASK X86_EFLAGS_VM
#else
#define X86_VM_MASK 0 /* No VM86 support */
#endif
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
/*
* This is the (kernel) stack-layout when we have done a "SAVE_ALL" from vm86
......@@ -142,7 +137,6 @@ struct vm86plus_struct {
* at the end of the structure. Look at ptrace.h to see the "normal"
* setup. For user space layout see 'struct vm86_regs' above.
*/
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
struct kernel_vm86_regs {
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment