Commit 6554287b authored by Bart Oldeman's avatar Bart Oldeman Committed by H. Peter Anvin

x86, vm86: Fix preemption bug for int1 debug and int3 breakpoint handlers.

Impact: fix kernel bug such as:
BUG: scheduling while atomic: dosemu.bin/19680/0x00000004
See also Ubuntu bug 455067 at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/455067

Commits 4915a35e
("Use preempt_conditional_sti/cli in do_int3, like on x86_64.")
and 3d2a71a5
("x86, traps: converge do_debug handlers")
started disabling preemption in int1 and int3 handlers on i386.
The problem with vm86 is that the call to handle_vm86_trap() may jump
straight to entry_32.S and never returns so preempt is never enabled
again, and there is an imbalance in the preempt count.

Commit be716615 ("x86, vm86:
fix preemption bug"), which was later (accidentally?) reverted by commit
08d68323 ("hw-breakpoints: modifying
generic debug exception to use thread-specific debug registers")
fixed the problem for debug exceptions but not for breakpoints.

There are three solutions to this problem.

1. Reenable preemption before calling handle_vm86_trap(). This
was the approach that was later reverted.

2. Do not disable preemption for i386 in breakpoint and debug handlers.
This was the situation before October 2008. As far as I understand
preemption only needs to be disabled on x86_64 because a seperate stack is
used, but it's nice to have things work the same way on
i386 and x86_64.

3. Let handle_vm86_trap() return instead of jumping to assembly code.
By setting a flag in _TIF_WORK_MASK, either TIF_IRET or TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME,
the code in entry_32.S is instructed to return to 32 bit mode from
V86 mode. The logic in entry_32.S was already present to handle signals.
(I chose TIF_IRET because it's slightly more efficient in
do_notify_resume() in signal.c, but in fact TIF_IRET can probably be
replaced by TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME everywhere.)

I'm submitting approach 3, because I believe it is the most elegant
and prevents future confusion. Still, an obvious
preempt_conditional_cli(regs); is necessary in traps.c to correct the
bug.

[ hpa: This is technically a regression, but because:
  1. the regression is so old,
  2. the patch seems relatively high risk, justifying more testing, and
  3. we're late in the 2.6.36-rc cycle,

  I'm queuing it up for the 2.6.37 merge window.  It might, however,
  justify as a -stable backport at a latter time, hence Cc: stable. ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarBart Oldeman <bartoldeman@users.sourceforge.net>
LKML-Reference: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009231312330.4732@localhost.localdomain>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: K.Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
parent 57aebd77
...@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ dotraplinkage void __kprobes do_debug(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code) ...@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ dotraplinkage void __kprobes do_debug(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK) { if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK) {
handle_vm86_trap((struct kernel_vm86_regs *) regs, handle_vm86_trap((struct kernel_vm86_regs *) regs,
error_code, 1); error_code, 1);
preempt_conditional_cli(regs);
return; return;
} }
......
...@@ -551,8 +551,14 @@ static void do_int(struct kernel_vm86_regs *regs, int i, ...@@ -551,8 +551,14 @@ static void do_int(struct kernel_vm86_regs *regs, int i,
int handle_vm86_trap(struct kernel_vm86_regs *regs, long error_code, int trapno) int handle_vm86_trap(struct kernel_vm86_regs *regs, long error_code, int trapno)
{ {
if (VMPI.is_vm86pus) { if (VMPI.is_vm86pus) {
if ((trapno == 3) || (trapno == 1)) if ((trapno == 3) || (trapno == 1)) {
return_to_32bit(regs, VM86_TRAP + (trapno << 8)); KVM86->regs32->ax = VM86_TRAP + (trapno << 8);
/* setting this flag forces the code in entry_32.S to
call save_v86_state() and change the stack pointer
to KVM86->regs32 */
set_thread_flag(TIF_IRET);
return 0;
}
do_int(regs, trapno, (unsigned char __user *) (regs->pt.ss << 4), SP(regs)); do_int(regs, trapno, (unsigned char __user *) (regs->pt.ss << 4), SP(regs));
return 0; return 0;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment