Commit 670c2324 authored by Miklos Szeredi's avatar Miklos Szeredi

ovl: obsolete "check_copy_up" module option

This was provided for debugging the ro/rw inconsistecy.  The inconsitency
is now gone so this option is obsolete.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
parent fb16043b
......@@ -25,35 +25,20 @@
#define OVL_COPY_UP_CHUNK_SIZE (1 << 20)
static bool __read_mostly ovl_check_copy_up;
module_param_named(check_copy_up, ovl_check_copy_up, bool,
S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(ovl_check_copy_up,
"Warn on copy-up when causing process also has a R/O fd open");
static int ovl_check_fd(const void *data, struct file *f, unsigned int fd)
static int ovl_ccup_set(const char *buf, const struct kernel_param *param)
{
const struct dentry *dentry = data;
if (file_inode(f) == d_inode(dentry))
pr_warn_ratelimited("overlayfs: Warning: Copying up %pD, but open R/O on fd %u which will cease to be coherent [pid=%d %s]\n",
f, fd, current->pid, current->comm);
pr_warn("overlayfs: \"check_copy_up\" module option is obsolete\n");
return 0;
}
/*
* Check the fds open by this process and warn if something like the following
* scenario is about to occur:
*
* fd1 = open("foo", O_RDONLY);
* fd2 = open("foo", O_RDWR);
*/
static void ovl_do_check_copy_up(struct dentry *dentry)
static int ovl_ccup_get(char *buf, const struct kernel_param *param)
{
if (ovl_check_copy_up)
iterate_fd(current->files, 0, ovl_check_fd, dentry);
return sprintf(buf, "N\n");
}
module_param_call(check_copy_up, ovl_ccup_set, ovl_ccup_get, NULL, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(ovl_check_copy_up, "Obsolete; does nothing");
int ovl_copy_xattr(struct dentry *old, struct dentry *new)
{
ssize_t list_size, size, value_size = 0;
......@@ -719,7 +704,6 @@ static int ovl_copy_up_one(struct dentry *parent, struct dentry *dentry,
if (IS_ERR(ctx.link))
return PTR_ERR(ctx.link);
}
ovl_do_check_copy_up(ctx.lowerpath.dentry);
err = ovl_copy_up_start(dentry);
/* err < 0: interrupted, err > 0: raced with another copy-up */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment