Commit 68d41d8c authored by Yuyang Du's avatar Yuyang Du Committed by Ingo Molnar

locking/lockdep: Fix lock used or unused stats error

The stats variable nr_unused_locks is incremented every time a new lock
class is register and decremented when the lock is first used in
__lock_acquire(). And after all, it is shown and checked in lockdep_stats.

However, under configurations that either CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not defined:

The commit:

  09180651 ("locking/lockdep: Consolidate lock usage bit initialization")

missed marking the LOCK_USED flag at IRQ usage initialization because
as mark_usage() is not called. And the commit:

  886532ae ("locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING")

further made mark_lock() not defined such that the LOCK_USED cannot be
marked at all when the lock is first acquired.

As a result, we fix this by not showing and checking the stats under such
configurations for lockdep_stats.
Reported-by: default avatarQian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: frederic@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190709101522.9117-1-duyuyang@gmail.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent f632a817
...@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) ...@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
nr_hardirq_read_safe = 0, nr_hardirq_read_unsafe = 0, nr_hardirq_read_safe = 0, nr_hardirq_read_unsafe = 0,
sum_forward_deps = 0; sum_forward_deps = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
list_for_each_entry(class, &all_lock_classes, lock_entry) { list_for_each_entry(class, &all_lock_classes, lock_entry) {
if (class->usage_mask == 0) if (class->usage_mask == 0)
...@@ -241,12 +242,12 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) ...@@ -241,12 +242,12 @@ static int lockdep_stats_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ) if (class->usage_mask & LOCKF_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ)
nr_hardirq_read_unsafe++; nr_hardirq_read_unsafe++;
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
sum_forward_deps += lockdep_count_forward_deps(class); sum_forward_deps += lockdep_count_forward_deps(class);
#endif
} }
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(debug_atomic_read(nr_unused_locks) != nr_unused); DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(debug_atomic_read(nr_unused_locks) != nr_unused);
#endif
#endif #endif
seq_printf(m, " lock-classes: %11lu [max: %lu]\n", seq_printf(m, " lock-classes: %11lu [max: %lu]\n",
nr_lock_classes, MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS); nr_lock_classes, MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment