Commit 6c53823a authored by Johan Hedberg's avatar Johan Hedberg Committed by Marcel Holtmann

Bluetooth: Fix tracking local SSP authentication requirement

When we need to make the decision whether to perform just-works or real
user confirmation we need to know the exact local authentication
requirement that was passed to the controller. So far conn->auth_type
(the local requirement) wasn't in one case updated appropriately in fear
of the user confirmation being rejected later.

The real problem however was not really that conn->auth_type couldn't
represent the true value but that we were checking the local MITM
requirement in an incorrect way. It's perfectly fine to let auth_type
follow what we tell the controller since we're still tracking the target
security level with conn->pending_sec_level.

This patch updates the check for local MITM requirement in the
hci_user_confirm_request_evt function to use the locally requested
security level and ensures that auth_type always represents what we tell
the controller. All other code in hci_user_confirm_request_evt still
uses the auth_type instead of pending_sec_level for determining whether
to do just-works or not, since that's the only value that's in sync with
what the remote device knows.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarSzymon Janc <szymon.janc@tieto.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.16
parent 6afd04ad
...@@ -3664,18 +3664,14 @@ static void hci_io_capa_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) ...@@ -3664,18 +3664,14 @@ static void hci_io_capa_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
/* If we are initiators, there is no remote information yet */ /* If we are initiators, there is no remote information yet */
if (conn->remote_auth == 0xff) { if (conn->remote_auth == 0xff) {
cp.authentication = conn->auth_type;
/* Request MITM protection if our IO caps allow it /* Request MITM protection if our IO caps allow it
* except for the no-bonding case. * except for the no-bonding case.
* conn->auth_type is not updated here since
* that might cause the user confirmation to be
* rejected in case the remote doesn't have the
* IO capabilities for MITM.
*/ */
if (conn->io_capability != HCI_IO_NO_INPUT_OUTPUT && if (conn->io_capability != HCI_IO_NO_INPUT_OUTPUT &&
cp.authentication != HCI_AT_NO_BONDING) cp.authentication != HCI_AT_NO_BONDING)
cp.authentication |= 0x01; conn->auth_type |= 0x01;
cp.authentication = conn->auth_type;
} else { } else {
conn->auth_type = hci_get_auth_req(conn); conn->auth_type = hci_get_auth_req(conn);
cp.authentication = conn->auth_type; cp.authentication = conn->auth_type;
...@@ -3747,9 +3743,12 @@ static void hci_user_confirm_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, ...@@ -3747,9 +3743,12 @@ static void hci_user_confirm_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev,
rem_mitm = (conn->remote_auth & 0x01); rem_mitm = (conn->remote_auth & 0x01);
/* If we require MITM but the remote device can't provide that /* If we require MITM but the remote device can't provide that
* (it has NoInputNoOutput) then reject the confirmation request * (it has NoInputNoOutput) then reject the confirmation
* request. We check the security level here since it doesn't
* necessarily match conn->auth_type.
*/ */
if (loc_mitm && conn->remote_cap == HCI_IO_NO_INPUT_OUTPUT) { if (conn->pending_sec_level > BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM &&
conn->remote_cap == HCI_IO_NO_INPUT_OUTPUT) {
BT_DBG("Rejecting request: remote device can't provide MITM"); BT_DBG("Rejecting request: remote device can't provide MITM");
hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_USER_CONFIRM_NEG_REPLY, hci_send_cmd(hdev, HCI_OP_USER_CONFIRM_NEG_REPLY,
sizeof(ev->bdaddr), &ev->bdaddr); sizeof(ev->bdaddr), &ev->bdaddr);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment