Commit 6e1918cf authored by Daniel Rosenberg's avatar Daniel Rosenberg Committed by Eric Biggers

fscrypt: don't allow v1 policies with casefolding

Casefolded encrypted directories will use a new dirhash method that
requires a secret key.  If the directory uses a v2 encryption policy,
it's easy to derive this key from the master key using HKDF.  However,
v1 encryption policies don't provide a way to derive additional keys.

Therefore, don't allow casefolding on directories that use a v1 policy.
Specifically, make it so that trying to enable casefolding on a
directory that has a v1 policy fails, trying to set a v1 policy on a
casefolded directory fails, and trying to open a casefolded directory
that has a v1 policy (if one somehow exists on-disk) fails.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
[EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, and other cleanups]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-2-ebiggers@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
parent 1b3b827e
...@@ -513,7 +513,9 @@ FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY can fail with the following errors: ...@@ -513,7 +513,9 @@ FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY can fail with the following errors:
- ``EEXIST``: the file is already encrypted with an encryption policy - ``EEXIST``: the file is already encrypted with an encryption policy
different from the one specified different from the one specified
- ``EINVAL``: an invalid encryption policy was specified (invalid - ``EINVAL``: an invalid encryption policy was specified (invalid
version, mode(s), or flags; or reserved bits were set) version, mode(s), or flags; or reserved bits were set); or a v1
encryption policy was specified but the directory has the casefold
flag enabled (casefolding is incompatible with v1 policies).
- ``ENOKEY``: a v2 encryption policy was specified, but the key with - ``ENOKEY``: a v2 encryption policy was specified, but the key with
the specified ``master_key_identifier`` has not been added, nor does the specified ``master_key_identifier`` has not been added, nor does
the process have the CAP_FOWNER capability in the initial user the process have the CAP_FOWNER capability in the initial user
......
...@@ -122,6 +122,34 @@ int __fscrypt_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, ...@@ -122,6 +122,34 @@ int __fscrypt_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
} }
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fscrypt_prepare_lookup); EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fscrypt_prepare_lookup);
/**
* fscrypt_prepare_setflags() - prepare to change flags with FS_IOC_SETFLAGS
* @inode: the inode on which flags are being changed
* @oldflags: the old flags
* @flags: the new flags
*
* The caller should be holding i_rwsem for write.
*
* Return: 0 on success; -errno if the flags change isn't allowed or if
* another error occurs.
*/
int fscrypt_prepare_setflags(struct inode *inode,
unsigned int oldflags, unsigned int flags)
{
struct fscrypt_info *ci;
int err;
if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode) && (flags & ~oldflags & FS_CASEFOLD_FL)) {
err = fscrypt_require_key(inode);
if (err)
return err;
ci = inode->i_crypt_info;
if (ci->ci_policy.version != FSCRYPT_POLICY_V2)
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
int __fscrypt_prepare_symlink(struct inode *dir, unsigned int len, int __fscrypt_prepare_symlink(struct inode *dir, unsigned int len,
unsigned int max_len, unsigned int max_len,
struct fscrypt_str *disk_link) struct fscrypt_str *disk_link)
......
...@@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ static bool fscrypt_supported_v1_policy(const struct fscrypt_policy_v1 *policy, ...@@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ static bool fscrypt_supported_v1_policy(const struct fscrypt_policy_v1 *policy,
policy->filenames_encryption_mode)) policy->filenames_encryption_mode))
return false; return false;
if (IS_CASEFOLDED(inode)) {
/* With v1, there's no way to derive dirhash keys. */
fscrypt_warn(inode,
"v1 policies can't be used on casefolded directories");
return false;
}
return true; return true;
} }
......
...@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ ...@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include <linux/security.h> #include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/cdev.h> #include <linux/cdev.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h> #include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/fscrypt.h>
#include <linux/fsnotify.h> #include <linux/fsnotify.h>
#include <linux/mount.h> #include <linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/posix_acl.h> #include <linux/posix_acl.h>
...@@ -2252,7 +2253,7 @@ int vfs_ioc_setflags_prepare(struct inode *inode, unsigned int oldflags, ...@@ -2252,7 +2253,7 @@ int vfs_ioc_setflags_prepare(struct inode *inode, unsigned int oldflags,
!capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE)) !capable(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE))
return -EPERM; return -EPERM;
return 0; return fscrypt_prepare_setflags(inode, oldflags, flags);
} }
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_ioc_setflags_prepare); EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_ioc_setflags_prepare);
......
...@@ -263,6 +263,8 @@ extern int __fscrypt_prepare_rename(struct inode *old_dir, ...@@ -263,6 +263,8 @@ extern int __fscrypt_prepare_rename(struct inode *old_dir,
unsigned int flags); unsigned int flags);
extern int __fscrypt_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, extern int __fscrypt_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
struct fscrypt_name *fname); struct fscrypt_name *fname);
extern int fscrypt_prepare_setflags(struct inode *inode,
unsigned int oldflags, unsigned int flags);
extern int __fscrypt_prepare_symlink(struct inode *dir, unsigned int len, extern int __fscrypt_prepare_symlink(struct inode *dir, unsigned int len,
unsigned int max_len, unsigned int max_len,
struct fscrypt_str *disk_link); struct fscrypt_str *disk_link);
...@@ -519,6 +521,13 @@ static inline int __fscrypt_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir, ...@@ -519,6 +521,13 @@ static inline int __fscrypt_prepare_lookup(struct inode *dir,
return -EOPNOTSUPP; return -EOPNOTSUPP;
} }
static inline int fscrypt_prepare_setflags(struct inode *inode,
unsigned int oldflags,
unsigned int flags)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int __fscrypt_prepare_symlink(struct inode *dir, static inline int __fscrypt_prepare_symlink(struct inode *dir,
unsigned int len, unsigned int len,
unsigned int max_len, unsigned int max_len,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment