Commit 6e3354c1 authored by Simon Arlott's avatar Simon Arlott Committed by Patrick McHardy

netfilter: nf_nat: remove warn_if_extra_mangle

In net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_rule.c, the function warn_if_extra_mangle was added
in commit 5b1158e9 (2006-12-02). I have a DNAT
target in the OUTPUT chain than changes connections with dst 2.0.0.1 to another
address which I'll substitute with 66.102.9.99 below.

On every boot I get the following message:
[  146.252505] NAT: no longer support implicit source local NAT
[  146.252517] NAT: packet src 66.102.9.99 -> dst 2.0.0.1

As far as I can tell from reading the function doing this, it should warn if the
source IP for the route to 66.102.9.99 is different from 2.0.0.1 but that is not
the case. It doesn't make sense to check the DNAT target against the local route
source.

Either the function should be changed to correctly check the route, or it should
be removed entirely as it's been nearly 2 years since it was added.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSimon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
parent 249b6203
......@@ -86,24 +86,6 @@ ipt_snat_target(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_target_param *par)
return nf_nat_setup_info(ct, &mr->range[0], IP_NAT_MANIP_SRC);
}
/* Before 2.6.11 we did implicit source NAT if required. Warn about change. */
static void warn_if_extra_mangle(struct net *net, __be32 dstip, __be32 srcip)
{
static int warned = 0;
struct flowi fl = { .nl_u = { .ip4_u = { .daddr = dstip } } };
struct rtable *rt;
if (ip_route_output_key(net, &rt, &fl) != 0)
return;
if (rt->rt_src != srcip && !warned) {
printk("NAT: no longer support implicit source local NAT\n");
printk("NAT: packet src %pI4 -> dst %pI4\n", &srcip, &dstip);
warned = 1;
}
ip_rt_put(rt);
}
static unsigned int
ipt_dnat_target(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_target_param *par)
{
......@@ -119,11 +101,6 @@ ipt_dnat_target(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_target_param *par)
/* Connection must be valid and new. */
NF_CT_ASSERT(ct && (ctinfo == IP_CT_NEW || ctinfo == IP_CT_RELATED));
if (par->hooknum == NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT &&
mr->range[0].flags & IP_NAT_RANGE_MAP_IPS)
warn_if_extra_mangle(dev_net(par->out), ip_hdr(skb)->daddr,
mr->range[0].min_ip);
return nf_nat_setup_info(ct, &mr->range[0], IP_NAT_MANIP_DST);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment