Commit 71928b3a authored by Matthias Beyer's avatar Matthias Beyer Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

Staging: bcm: Fixed indention for inner if-block

The inner if-statement was aligned just like the outer one. Why?

This indention was introduced by

    f34c488c

which is a indention-fix patch itself. That's why I'm curious about it.

I did not merge these nested if-statements, as I don't know if I'm
destroying logical seperated checks with it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthias Beyer <mail@beyermatthias.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 41f3b52c
...@@ -1216,11 +1216,11 @@ int download_ddr_settings(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter) ...@@ -1216,11 +1216,11 @@ int download_ddr_settings(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter)
if (!retval) { if (!retval) {
if (bOverrideSelfRefresh && (psDDRSetting->ulRegAddress == 0x0F007018)) { if (bOverrideSelfRefresh && (psDDRSetting->ulRegAddress == 0x0F007018)) {
value = (psDDRSetting->ulRegValue | (1<<8)); value = (psDDRSetting->ulRegValue | (1<<8));
if (STATUS_SUCCESS != wrmalt(Adapter, ul_ddr_setting_load_addr, if (STATUS_SUCCESS != wrmalt(Adapter, ul_ddr_setting_load_addr,
&value, sizeof(value))) { &value, sizeof(value))) {
BCM_DEBUG_PRINT(Adapter, DBG_TYPE_PRINTK, 0, 0, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__); BCM_DEBUG_PRINT(Adapter, DBG_TYPE_PRINTK, 0, 0, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);
break; break;
} }
} else { } else {
value = psDDRSetting->ulRegValue; value = psDDRSetting->ulRegValue;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment