Commit 74005674 authored by Jan Kara's avatar Jan Kara Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

isofs: Do not return EACCES for unknown filesystems

commit a2ed0b39 upstream.

When isofs_mount() is called to mount a device read-write, it returns
EACCES even before it checks that the device actually contains an isofs
filesystem. This may confuse mount(8) which then tries to mount all
subsequent filesystem types in read-only mode.

Fix the problem by returning EACCES only once we verify that the device
indeed contains an iso9660 filesystem.

Fixes: 17b7f7cfReported-by: default avatarKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Reported-by: default avatarKarel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 76fd38ea
...@@ -690,6 +690,11 @@ static int isofs_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, int silent) ...@@ -690,6 +690,11 @@ static int isofs_fill_super(struct super_block *s, void *data, int silent)
pri_bh = NULL; pri_bh = NULL;
root_found: root_found:
/* We don't support read-write mounts */
if (!(s->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
error = -EACCES;
goto out_freebh;
}
if (joliet_level && (pri == NULL || !opt.rock)) { if (joliet_level && (pri == NULL || !opt.rock)) {
/* This is the case of Joliet with the norock mount flag. /* This is the case of Joliet with the norock mount flag.
...@@ -1503,9 +1508,6 @@ struct inode *__isofs_iget(struct super_block *sb, ...@@ -1503,9 +1508,6 @@ struct inode *__isofs_iget(struct super_block *sb,
static struct dentry *isofs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type, static struct dentry *isofs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
int flags, const char *dev_name, void *data) int flags, const char *dev_name, void *data)
{ {
/* We don't support read-write mounts */
if (!(flags & MS_RDONLY))
return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
return mount_bdev(fs_type, flags, dev_name, data, isofs_fill_super); return mount_bdev(fs_type, flags, dev_name, data, isofs_fill_super);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment