Commit 822bc180 authored by Paul Turner's avatar Paul Turner Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: Fix unregister_fair_sched_group()

In the flipping and flopping between calling
unregister_fair_sched_group() on a per-cpu versus per-group basis
we ended up in a bad state.

Remove from the list for the passed cpu as opposed to some
arbitrary index.

( This fixes explosions w/ autogroup as well as a group
  creation/destruction stress test. )
Reported-by: default avatarStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <20101130005740.080828123@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent b7a2b39d
......@@ -8085,7 +8085,6 @@ static inline void unregister_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
unsigned long flags;
int i;
/*
* Only empty task groups can be destroyed; so we can speculatively
......@@ -8095,7 +8094,7 @@ static inline void unregister_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
return;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(tg->cfs_rq[i]);
list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(tg->cfs_rq[cpu]);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
}
#else /* !CONFG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment