Commit 82577360 authored by Viresh Kumar's avatar Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: Reuse new freq-table helpers

This patch migrates few users of cpufreq tables to the new helpers
that work on sorted freq-tables.
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent da0c6dc0
......@@ -468,20 +468,14 @@ unsigned int acpi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = policy->driver_data;
struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *entry;
unsigned int next_perf_state, next_freq, freq;
unsigned int next_perf_state, next_freq, index;
/*
* Find the closest frequency above target_freq.
*
* The table is sorted in the reverse order with respect to the
* frequency and all of the entries are valid (see the initialization).
*/
entry = policy->freq_table;
do {
entry++;
freq = entry->frequency;
} while (freq >= target_freq && freq != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END);
entry--;
index = cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(policy, target_freq);
entry = &policy->freq_table[index];
next_freq = entry->frequency;
next_perf_state = entry->driver_data;
......
......@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ static unsigned int amd_powersave_bias_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
else {
unsigned int index;
index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy,
policy->cur - 1, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
index = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy,
policy->cur - 1);
freq_next = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
}
......
......@@ -85,11 +85,9 @@ static unsigned int generic_powersave_bias_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
freq_avg = freq_req - freq_reduc;
/* Find freq bounds for freq_avg in freq_table */
index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_avg,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
index = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy, freq_avg);
freq_lo = freq_table[index].frequency;
index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_avg,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
index = cpufreq_table_find_index_l(policy, freq_avg);
freq_hi = freq_table[index].frequency;
/* Find out how long we have to be in hi and lo freqs */
......
......@@ -760,8 +760,7 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
struct cpufreq_policy policy;
cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(&policy, policy.cur,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_C);
index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
}
......
......@@ -246,8 +246,7 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
new_freq = s5pv210_freq_table[index].frequency;
/* Finding current running level index */
priv_index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, old_freq,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
priv_index = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy, old_freq);
arm_volt = dvs_conf[index].arm_volt;
int_volt = dvs_conf[index].int_volt;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment