Commit 82a5803c authored by Dan Carpenter's avatar Dan Carpenter Committed by Jonathan Cameron

staging: iio: ad799x: remove some unneeded IS_ERR() checks

My static checker is upset that we check IS_ERR(t->reg) when we know it
is not an ERR_PTR.

Checking for IS_ERR() twice is often a sign of confusion and buggy code.
In this case, if the call to "ret = regulator_enable(st->vref);" fails,
then we call "regulator_disable(st->vref);" and that's a mistake because
"st->vref" is not enabled.

I fixed these problems and Hartmut Knaack pointed out a couple unneeded
IS_ERR() checks in ad799x_remove() so I have removed those as well.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: default avatarHartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
parent fd8122d1
......@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static int ad799x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
ret = iio_triggered_buffer_setup(indio_dev, NULL,
&ad799x_trigger_handler, NULL);
if (ret)
goto error_disable_reg;
goto error_disable_vref;
if (client->irq > 0) {
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev,
......@@ -739,11 +739,10 @@ static int ad799x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
error_cleanup_ring:
iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
error_disable_vref:
regulator_disable(st->vref);
error_disable_reg:
if (!IS_ERR(st->vref))
regulator_disable(st->vref);
if (!IS_ERR(st->reg))
regulator_disable(st->reg);
regulator_disable(st->reg);
return ret;
}
......@@ -756,10 +755,8 @@ static int ad799x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
if (!IS_ERR(st->vref))
regulator_disable(st->vref);
if (!IS_ERR(st->reg))
regulator_disable(st->reg);
regulator_disable(st->vref);
regulator_disable(st->reg);
kfree(st->rx_buf);
return 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment