rtlwifi: btcoex: remove identical statements within if-else branches

Since the statements are identical, we can safely remove the statements.
The commit 42e74946 ("rtlwifi: btcoexist: Fix if == else warnings in
halbtc8821a1ant.c") had fixed the statements, but the commit c6821613
("rtlwifi: btcoex: follow linux coding style") that converted coding style
and upgraded btcoex didn't include the fix.
Reported-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8821a1ant.c

@@ -1584,11 +1584,7 @@ static void btc8821a1ant_act_bt_sco_hid_only_busy(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist,
 	/* tdma and coex table */
 	btc8821a1ant_ps_tdma(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, true, 5);
 
-	if (BT_8821A_1ANT_WIFI_STATUS_NON_CONNECTED_ASSO_AUTH_SCAN ==
-	    wifi_status)
-		btc8821a1ant_coex_table_with_type(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, 1);
-	else
-		btc8821a1ant_coex_table_with_type(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, 1);
+	btc8821a1ant_coex_table_with_type(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, 1);
 }
 
 static void btc8821a1ant_act_wifi_con_bt_acl_busy(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist,
@@ -1991,16 +1987,9 @@ static void btc8821a1ant_run_coexist_mechanism(struct btc_coexist *btcoexist)
 			wifi_rssi_state =
 				btc8821a1ant_wifi_rssi_state(btcoexist, 1, 2,
 							     30, 0);
-			if ((wifi_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_HIGH) ||
-			    (wifi_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_STAY_HIGH)) {
-				btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
-							NORMAL_EXEC, 1, 1,
-							0, 1);
-			} else {
-				btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
-							NORMAL_EXEC, 1, 1,
-							0, 1);
-			}
+			btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist,
+						NORMAL_EXEC, 1, 1,
+						0, 1);
 		} else {
 			btc8821a1ant_limited_tx(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC,
 						0, 0, 0, 0);