Commit 8d495477 authored by Frederic Weisbecker's avatar Frederic Weisbecker Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/cputime: Spare a seqcount lock/unlock cycle on context switch

On context switch we are locking the vtime seqcount of the scheduling-out
task twice:

 * On vtime_task_switch_common(), when we flush the pending vtime through
   vtime_account_system()

 * On arch_vtime_task_switch() to reset the vtime state.

This is pointless as these actions can be performed without the need
to unlock/lock in the middle. The reason these steps are separated is to
consolidate a very small amount of common code between
CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN and CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE.

Performance in this fast path is definitely a priority over artificial
code factorization so split the task switch code between GEN and
NATIVE and mutualize the parts than can run under a single seqcount
locked block.

As a side effect, vtime_account_idle() becomes included in the seqcount
protection. This happens to be a welcome preparation in order to
properly support kcpustat under vtime in the future and fetch
CPUTIME_IDLE without race.
Signed-off-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Cc: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191003161745.28464-3-frederic@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent f83eeb1a
......@@ -14,8 +14,12 @@ struct task_struct;
* vtime_accounting_cpu_enabled() definitions/declarations
*/
#if defined(CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE)
static inline bool vtime_accounting_cpu_enabled(void) { return true; }
extern void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev);
#elif defined(CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN)
/*
* Checks if vtime is enabled on some CPU. Cputime readers want to be careful
* in that case and compute the tickless cputime.
......@@ -36,33 +40,29 @@ static inline bool vtime_accounting_cpu_enabled(void)
return false;
}
extern void vtime_task_switch_generic(struct task_struct *prev);
static inline void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
{
if (vtime_accounting_cpu_enabled())
vtime_task_switch_generic(prev);
}
#else /* !CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING */
static inline bool vtime_accounting_cpu_enabled(void) { return false; }
#endif
static inline void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev) { }
#endif
/*
* Common vtime APIs
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
#ifdef __ARCH_HAS_VTIME_TASK_SWITCH
extern void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev);
#else
extern void vtime_common_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev);
static inline void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
{
if (vtime_accounting_cpu_enabled())
vtime_common_task_switch(prev);
}
#endif /* __ARCH_HAS_VTIME_TASK_SWITCH */
extern void vtime_account_kernel(struct task_struct *tsk);
extern void vtime_account_idle(struct task_struct *tsk);
#else /* !CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING */
static inline void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev) { }
static inline void vtime_account_kernel(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
#endif /* !CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING */
......
......@@ -405,9 +405,10 @@ static inline void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_
/*
* Use precise platform statistics if available:
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING
#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
# ifndef __ARCH_HAS_VTIME_TASK_SWITCH
void vtime_common_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
void vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
{
if (is_idle_task(prev))
vtime_account_idle(prev);
......@@ -418,10 +419,7 @@ void vtime_common_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
arch_vtime_task_switch(prev);
}
# endif
#endif /* CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING */
#ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE
/*
* Archs that account the whole time spent in the idle task
* (outside irq) as idle time can rely on this and just implement
......@@ -731,6 +729,16 @@ static void vtime_account_guest(struct task_struct *tsk,
}
}
static void __vtime_account_kernel(struct task_struct *tsk,
struct vtime *vtime)
{
/* We might have scheduled out from guest path */
if (tsk->flags & PF_VCPU)
vtime_account_guest(tsk, vtime);
else
vtime_account_system(tsk, vtime);
}
void vtime_account_kernel(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
struct vtime *vtime = &tsk->vtime;
......@@ -739,11 +747,7 @@ void vtime_account_kernel(struct task_struct *tsk)
return;
write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
/* We might have scheduled out from guest path */
if (tsk->flags & PF_VCPU)
vtime_account_guest(tsk, vtime);
else
vtime_account_system(tsk, vtime);
__vtime_account_kernel(tsk, vtime);
write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
}
......@@ -804,11 +808,15 @@ void vtime_account_idle(struct task_struct *tsk)
account_idle_time(get_vtime_delta(&tsk->vtime));
}
void arch_vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
void vtime_task_switch_generic(struct task_struct *prev)
{
struct vtime *vtime = &prev->vtime;
write_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
if (is_idle_task(prev))
vtime_account_idle(prev);
else
__vtime_account_kernel(prev, vtime);
vtime->state = VTIME_INACTIVE;
write_seqcount_end(&vtime->seqcount);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment