Staging: lustre: Use list_{next/prev}_entry instead of list_entry

This patch replace list_entry with list_{next/prev}_entry as it makes
the code more clear to read.
Done using coccinelle:

@@
expression e1;
identifier e3;
type t;
@@
(
- list_entry(e1->e3.next,t,e3)
+ list_next_entry(e1,e3)
|
- list_entry(e1->e3.prev,t,e3)
+ list_prev_entry(e1,e3)
)
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd_proto.c

@@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ ksocknal_next_tx_carrier(ksock_conn_t *conn)
 		/* no more packets queued */
 		conn->ksnc_tx_carrier = NULL;
 	} else {
-		conn->ksnc_tx_carrier = list_entry(tx->tx_list.next,
-						       ksock_tx_t, tx_list);
+		conn->ksnc_tx_carrier = list_next_entry(tx, tx_list);
 		LASSERT(conn->ksnc_tx_carrier->tx_msg.ksm_type == tx->tx_msg.ksm_type);
 	}
 }

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c

@@ -890,8 +890,7 @@ static void search_granted_lock(struct list_head *queue,
 	list_for_each(tmp, queue) {
 		lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock, l_res_link);
 
-		mode_end = list_entry(lock->l_sl_mode.prev,
-					  struct ldlm_lock, l_sl_mode);
+		mode_end = list_prev_entry(lock, l_sl_mode);
 
 		if (lock->l_req_mode != req->l_req_mode) {
 			/* jump to last lock of mode group */
@@ -911,9 +910,7 @@ static void search_granted_lock(struct list_head *queue,
 		if (lock->l_resource->lr_type == LDLM_IBITS) {
 			for (;;) {
 				policy_end =
-					list_entry(lock->l_sl_policy.prev,
-						       struct ldlm_lock,
-						       l_sl_policy);
+					list_prev_entry(lock, l_sl_policy);
 
 				if (lock->l_policy_data.l_inodebits.bits ==
 				    req->l_policy_data.l_inodebits.bits) {