Commit 90008318 authored by David Teigland's avatar David Teigland

dlm: avoid unnecessary posix unlock

When the kernel clears flocks/plocks during close, it calls posix
unlock when there are flocks but no posix locks.  Without this
patch, that unnecessary posix unlock is passed to userland
(dlm_controld), across the cluster, and back to the kernel.
This can create a lot of plock activity, even when no posix
locks had been used.

This patch copies the nfs approach, and skips the full posix
unlock if there is no plock found during the vfs unlock phase.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
parent 31880c37
......@@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ int dlm_posix_unlock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
struct dlm_ls *ls;
struct plock_op *op;
int rv;
unsigned char fl_flags = fl->fl_flags;
ls = dlm_find_lockspace_local(lockspace);
if (!ls)
......@@ -258,9 +259,18 @@ int dlm_posix_unlock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
goto out;
}
if (posix_lock_file_wait(file, fl) < 0)
log_error(ls, "dlm_posix_unlock: vfs unlock error %llx",
(unsigned long long)number);
/* cause the vfs unlock to return ENOENT if lock is not found */
fl->fl_flags |= FL_EXISTS;
rv = posix_lock_file_wait(file, fl);
if (rv == -ENOENT) {
rv = 0;
goto out_free;
}
if (rv < 0) {
log_error(ls, "dlm_posix_unlock: vfs unlock error %d %llx",
rv, (unsigned long long)number);
}
op->info.optype = DLM_PLOCK_OP_UNLOCK;
op->info.pid = fl->fl_pid;
......@@ -296,9 +306,11 @@ int dlm_posix_unlock(dlm_lockspace_t *lockspace, u64 number, struct file *file,
if (rv == -ENOENT)
rv = 0;
out_free:
kfree(op);
out:
dlm_put_lockspace(ls);
fl->fl_flags = fl_flags;
return rv;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlm_posix_unlock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment