Commit 921372c2 authored by Anton Altaparmakov's avatar Anton Altaparmakov

NTFS: Modify fs/ntfs/mft.c::write_mft_record_nolock() and

      fs/ntfs/aops.c::ntfs_write_mst_block() to only check the dirty state
      of the first buffer in a record and to take this as the ntfs record
      dirty state.  We cannot look at the dirty state for subsequent
      buffers because we might be racing with
      fs/ntfs/aops.c::mark_ntfs_record_dirty().
Signed-off-by: default avatarAnton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>
parent 400f7bcb
...@@ -122,6 +122,12 @@ ToDo/Notes: ...@@ -122,6 +122,12 @@ ToDo/Notes:
ntfs inode as a parameter as this is confusing and misleading and the ntfs inode as a parameter as this is confusing and misleading and the
needed ntfs inode is available via NTFS_I(page->mapping->host). needed ntfs inode is available via NTFS_I(page->mapping->host).
Adapt all callers to this change. Adapt all callers to this change.
- Modify fs/ntfs/mft.c::write_mft_record_nolock() and
fs/ntfs/aops.c::ntfs_write_mst_block() to only check the dirty state
of the first buffer in a record and to take this as the ntfs record
dirty state. We cannot look at the dirty state for subsequent
buffers because we might be racing with
fs/ntfs/aops.c::mark_ntfs_record_dirty().
2.1.20 - Fix two stupid bugs introduced in 2.1.18 release. 2.1.20 - Fix two stupid bugs introduced in 2.1.18 release.
......
...@@ -868,23 +868,24 @@ static int ntfs_write_mst_block(struct writeback_control *wbc, ...@@ -868,23 +868,24 @@ static int ntfs_write_mst_block(struct writeback_control *wbc,
clear_buffer_dirty(bh); clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
continue; continue;
} }
if (rec_block == block) { if (likely(block < rec_block)) {
/*
* This block is not the first one in the record. We
* ignore the buffer's dirty state because we could
* have raced with a parallel mark_ntfs_record_dirty().
*/
if (!rec_is_dirty)
continue;
} else /* if (block == rec_block) */ {
BUG_ON(block > rec_block);
/* This block is the first one in the record. */ /* This block is the first one in the record. */
rec_block += bhs_per_rec; rec_block += bhs_per_rec;
if (!buffer_dirty(bh)) { if (!buffer_dirty(bh)) {
/* Clean buffers are not written out. */ /* Clean records are not written out. */
rec_is_dirty = FALSE; rec_is_dirty = FALSE;
continue; continue;
} }
rec_is_dirty = TRUE; rec_is_dirty = TRUE;
} else {
/* This block is not the first one in the record. */
if (!buffer_dirty(bh)) {
/* Clean buffers are not written out. */
BUG_ON(rec_is_dirty);
continue;
}
BUG_ON(!rec_is_dirty);
} }
BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh)); BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh));
BUG_ON(!buffer_uptodate(bh)); BUG_ON(!buffer_uptodate(bh));
...@@ -973,10 +974,8 @@ static int ntfs_write_mst_block(struct writeback_control *wbc, ...@@ -973,10 +974,8 @@ static int ntfs_write_mst_block(struct writeback_control *wbc,
continue; continue;
if (unlikely(test_set_buffer_locked(tbh))) if (unlikely(test_set_buffer_locked(tbh)))
BUG(); BUG();
if (unlikely(!test_clear_buffer_dirty(tbh))) { /* The buffer dirty state is now irrelevant, just clean it. */
unlock_buffer(tbh); clear_buffer_dirty(tbh);
continue;
}
BUG_ON(!buffer_uptodate(tbh)); BUG_ON(!buffer_uptodate(tbh));
BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(tbh)); BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(tbh));
get_bh(tbh); get_bh(tbh);
......
...@@ -572,8 +572,10 @@ int ntfs_sync_mft_mirror(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, ...@@ -572,8 +572,10 @@ int ntfs_sync_mft_mirror(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no,
* ntfs inode @ni to backing store. If the mft record @m has a counterpart in * ntfs inode @ni to backing store. If the mft record @m has a counterpart in
* the mft mirror, that is also updated. * the mft mirror, that is also updated.
* *
* We only write the mft record if the ntfs inode @ni is dirty and the buffers * We only write the mft record if the ntfs inode @ni is dirty and the first
* belonging to its mft record are dirty, too. * buffer belonging to its mft record is dirty, too. We ignore the dirty state
* of subsequent buffers because we could have raced with
* fs/ntfs/aops.c::mark_ntfs_record_dirty().
* *
* On success, clean the mft record and return 0. On error, leave the mft * On success, clean the mft record and return 0. On error, leave the mft
* record dirty and return -errno. The caller should call make_bad_inode() on * record dirty and return -errno. The caller should call make_bad_inode() on
...@@ -632,21 +634,23 @@ int write_mft_record_nolock(ntfs_inode *ni, MFT_RECORD *m, int sync) ...@@ -632,21 +634,23 @@ int write_mft_record_nolock(ntfs_inode *ni, MFT_RECORD *m, int sync)
continue; continue;
if (unlikely(block_start >= m_end)) if (unlikely(block_start >= m_end))
break; break;
/* if (block_start == m_start) {
* If the buffer is clean and it is the first buffer of the mft /* This block is the first one in the record. */
* record, it was written out by other means already so we are if (!buffer_dirty(bh)) {
* done. For safety we make sure all the other buffers are /* Clean records are not written out. */
* clean also. If it is clean but not the first buffer and the
* first buffer was dirty it is a bug.
*/
if (!buffer_dirty(bh)) {
if (block_start == m_start)
rec_is_dirty = FALSE; rec_is_dirty = FALSE;
else continue;
BUG_ON(rec_is_dirty); }
continue; rec_is_dirty = TRUE;
} else {
/*
* This block is not the first one in the record. We
* ignore the buffer's dirty state because we could
* have raced with a parallel mark_ntfs_record_dirty().
*/
if (!rec_is_dirty)
continue;
} }
BUG_ON(!rec_is_dirty);
BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh)); BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh));
BUG_ON(!buffer_uptodate(bh)); BUG_ON(!buffer_uptodate(bh));
BUG_ON(!nr_bhs && (m_start != block_start)); BUG_ON(!nr_bhs && (m_start != block_start));
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment