Commit 934d96ea authored by Jaswinder Singh Rajput's avatar Jaswinder Singh Rajput Committed by Ingo Molnar

time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be static

Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning

Fixes sparse warning:

 kernel/time/tick-sched.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'tick_nohz_update_jiffies' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: default avatarJaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 6d612b0f
...@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz); ...@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz);
* value. We do this unconditionally on any cpu, as we don't know whether the * value. We do this unconditionally on any cpu, as we don't know whether the
* cpu, which has the update task assigned is in a long sleep. * cpu, which has the update task assigned is in a long sleep.
*/ */
void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void) static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
{ {
int cpu = smp_processor_id(); int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu); struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment