platform-drivers: x86: pmic: Use request_irq instead of chained handler

There is no need to install a chained handler for this hardware. This
is a plain x86 IOAPIC interrupt which is handled by the core code
perfectly fine. There is nothing special about demultiplexing these
gpio interrupts which justifies a custom hack. Replace it by a plain
old interrupt handler installed with request_irq. That makes the code
agnostic about the underlying primary interrupt hardware. The overhead
for this is minimal, but it gives us the advantage of accounting,
balancing and to detect interrupt storms. gpio interrupts are not
really that performance critical.

Patch fixups from akpm
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmic_gpio.c

@@ -74,19 +74,6 @@ struct pmic_gpio {
 	u32			trigger_type;
 };
 
-static void pmic_program_irqtype(int gpio, int type)
-{
-	if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
-		intel_scu_ipc_update_register(GPIO0 + gpio, 0x20, 0x20);
-	else
-		intel_scu_ipc_update_register(GPIO0 + gpio, 0x00, 0x20);
-
-	if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)
-		intel_scu_ipc_update_register(GPIO0 + gpio, 0x10, 0x10);
-	else
-		intel_scu_ipc_update_register(GPIO0 + gpio, 0x00, 0x10);
-};
-
 static int pmic_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 {
 	if (offset > 8) {
@@ -179,26 +166,6 @@ static int pmic_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 	return pg->irq_base + offset;
 }
 
-static void pmic_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
-{
-	struct pmic_gpio *pg = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
-
-	mutex_lock(&pg->buslock);
-}
-
-static void pmic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
-{
-	struct pmic_gpio *pg = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
-
-	if (pg->update_type) {
-		unsigned int gpio = pg->update_type & ~GPIO_UPDATE_TYPE;
-
-		pmic_program_irqtype(gpio, pg->trigger_type);
-		pg->update_type = 0;
-	}
-	mutex_unlock(&pg->buslock);
-}
-
 /* the gpiointr register is read-clear, so just do nothing. */
 static void pmic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data) { }
 
@@ -211,19 +178,21 @@ static struct irq_chip pmic_irqchip = {
 	.irq_set_type	= pmic_irq_type,
 };
 
-static void pmic_irq_handler(unsigned irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
+static irqreturn_t pmic_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
 {
-	struct pmic_gpio *pg = (struct pmic_gpio *)get_irq_data(irq);
+	struct pmic_gpio *pg = data;
 	u8 intsts = *((u8 *)pg->gpiointr + 4);
 	int gpio;
+	irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
 
 	for (gpio = 0; gpio < 8; gpio++) {
 		if (intsts & (1 << gpio)) {
 			pr_debug("pmic pin %d triggered\n", gpio);
 			generic_handle_irq(pg->irq_base + gpio);
+			ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
 		}
 	}
-	desc->chip->irq_eoi(get_irq_desc_chip_data(desc));
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int __devinit platform_pmic_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -280,8 +249,13 @@ static int __devinit platform_pmic_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Can not add pmic gpio chip.\n", __func__);
 		goto err;
 	}
-	set_irq_data(pg->irq, pg);
-	set_irq_chained_handler(pg->irq, pmic_irq_handler);
+
+	retval = request_irq(pg->irq, pmic_irq_handler, 0, "pmic", pg);
+	if (retval) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "pmic: Interrupt request failed\n");
+		goto err;
+	}
+
 	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
 		set_irq_chip_and_handler_name(i + pg->irq_base, &pmic_irqchip,
 					handle_simple_irq, "demux");