Commit 9930ca1a authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Update a couple of hangcheck comments to talk about engines

We still have lots of comments that refer to the old ring when we mean
struct intel_engine_cs and its hardware correspondence. This patch fixes
an instance inside hangcheck to talk about engines.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-10-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: default avatarJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469606850-28659-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
parent 7e21d648
......@@ -3140,13 +3140,13 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(struct work_struct *work)
}
} else {
/* We always increment the hangcheck score
* if the ring is busy and still processing
* if the engine is busy and still processing
* the same request, so that no single request
* can run indefinitely (such as a chain of
* batches). The only time we do not increment
* the hangcheck score on this ring, if this
* ring is in a legitimate wait for another
* ring. In that case the waiting ring is a
* engine is in a legitimate wait for another
* engine. In that case the waiting engine is a
* victim and we want to be sure we catch the
* right culprit. Then every time we do kick
* the ring, add a small increment to the
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment