Commit 9d682ea6 authored by Hans de Goede's avatar Hans de Goede Committed by Al Viro

vboxsf: Fix the check for the old binary mount-arguments struct

Fix the check for the mainline vboxsf code being used with the old
mount.vboxsf mount binary from the out-of-tree vboxsf version doing
a comparison between signed and unsigned data types.

This fixes the following smatch warnings:

fs/vboxsf/super.c:390 vboxsf_parse_monolithic() warn: impossible condition '(options[1] == (255)) => ((-128)-127 == 255)'
fs/vboxsf/super.c:391 vboxsf_parse_monolithic() warn: impossible condition '(options[2] == (254)) => ((-128)-127 == 254)'
fs/vboxsf/super.c:392 vboxsf_parse_monolithic() warn: impossible condition '(options[3] == (253)) => ((-128)-127 == 253)'
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
parent 9123e3a7
......@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ static int vboxsf_setup(void)
static int vboxsf_parse_monolithic(struct fs_context *fc, void *data)
{
char *options = data;
unsigned char *options = data;
if (options && options[0] == VBSF_MOUNT_SIGNATURE_BYTE_0 &&
options[1] == VBSF_MOUNT_SIGNATURE_BYTE_1 &&
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment