Commit a220dd73 authored by Ben Skeggs's avatar Ben Skeggs

drm/nouveau: check kind validity against mmu object

This is already handled in the top-level gem_new() ioctl in another manner,
but this will be removed in a future commit.

Ideally we'd not need to check up-front at all, and let the VMM code handle
error checking, but there are paths in the current BO management code where
this isn't possible due to map() not always being called during BO creation,
and map() calls not being allowed to fail during buffer migration.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
parent 01670a79
......@@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ nouveau_bo_new(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, int align,
{
struct nouveau_drm *drm = cli->drm;
struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
struct nvif_mmu *mmu = &cli->mmu;
size_t acc_size;
int ret;
int type = ttm_bo_type_device;
......@@ -215,11 +216,20 @@ nouveau_bo_new(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, int align,
if (cli->device.info.family >= NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_FERMI) {
nvbo->kind = (tile_flags & 0x0000ff00) >> 8;
nvbo->comp = gf100_pte_storage_type_map[nvbo->kind] != nvbo->kind;
if (!nvif_mmu_kind_valid(mmu, nvbo->kind)) {
kfree(nvbo);
return -EINVAL;
}
nvbo->comp = mmu->kind[nvbo->kind] != nvbo->kind;
} else
if (cli->device.info.family >= NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) {
nvbo->kind = (tile_flags & 0x00007f00) >> 8;
nvbo->comp = (tile_flags & 0x00030000) >> 16;
if (!nvif_mmu_kind_valid(mmu, nvbo->kind)) {
kfree(nvbo);
return -EINVAL;
}
} else {
nvbo->zeta = (tile_flags & 0x00000007);
}
......@@ -232,7 +242,7 @@ nouveau_bo_new(struct nouveau_cli *cli, u64 size, int align,
nvbo->page = drm->client.vm->mmu->lpg_shift;
else {
if (cli->device.info.family >= NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_FERMI)
nvbo->kind = gf100_pte_storage_type_map[nvbo->kind];
nvbo->kind = mmu->kind[nvbo->kind];
nvbo->comp = 0;
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment