Commit a3300ef4 authored by Hannes Frederic Sowa's avatar Hannes Frederic Sowa Committed by David S. Miller

ipv6: don't count addrconf generated routes against gc limit

Brett Ciphery reported that new ipv6 addresses failed to get installed
because the addrconf generated dsts where counted against the dst gc
limit. We don't need to count those routes like we currently don't count
administratively added routes.

Because the max_addresses check enforces a limit on unbounded address
generation first in case someone plays with router advertisments, we
are still safe here.
Reported-by: default avatarBrett Ciphery <brett.ciphery@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 6a46ff87
...@@ -2166,12 +2166,10 @@ struct rt6_info *addrconf_dst_alloc(struct inet6_dev *idev, ...@@ -2166,12 +2166,10 @@ struct rt6_info *addrconf_dst_alloc(struct inet6_dev *idev,
bool anycast) bool anycast)
{ {
struct net *net = dev_net(idev->dev); struct net *net = dev_net(idev->dev);
struct rt6_info *rt = ip6_dst_alloc(net, net->loopback_dev, 0, NULL); struct rt6_info *rt = ip6_dst_alloc(net, net->loopback_dev,
DST_NOCOUNT, NULL);
if (!rt) { if (!rt)
net_warn_ratelimited("Maximum number of routes reached, consider increasing route/max_size\n");
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
in6_dev_hold(idev); in6_dev_hold(idev);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment