Commit a6e492b9 authored by John W. Linville's avatar John W. Linville

iwlwifi: assume vif is NULL for internal scans and non-NULL otherwise

The current practice of checking vif for NULL in one place but not
another seems to confuse some static checkers, smatch in particular.
Since vif will only be NULL in the case of internal scans, adjust the
checks accordingly.
Reported-by: default avatarDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
parent 6cb8755b
......@@ -1234,7 +1234,10 @@ void iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Scanning while associated...\n");
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
interval = vif ? vif->bss_conf.beacon_int : 0;
if (priv->is_internal_short_scan)
interval = 0;
else
interval = vif->bss_conf.beacon_int;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
scan->suspend_time = 0;
......
......@@ -2881,7 +2881,10 @@ void iwl3945_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
IWL_DEBUG_INFO(priv, "Scanning while associated...\n");
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
interval = vif ? vif->bss_conf.beacon_int : 0;
if (priv->is_internal_short_scan)
interval = 0;
else
interval = vif->bss_conf.beacon_int;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
scan->suspend_time = 0;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment