Commit acfa9e94 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by David S. Miller

net: dont use __netdev_alloc_skb for bounce buffer

commit a1c7fff7 (net: netdev_alloc_skb() use build_skb()) broke b44 on
some 64bit machines.

It appears b44 and b43 use __netdev_alloc_skb() instead of alloc_skb()
for their bounce buffers.

There is no need to add an extra NET_SKB_PAD reservation for bounce
buffers :

- In TX path, NET_SKB_PAD is useless

- In RX path in b44, we force a copy of incoming frames if
  GFP_DMA allocations were needed.
Reported-and-bisected-by: default avatarStefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 3da947b2
......@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static int b44_alloc_rx_skb(struct b44 *bp, int src_idx, u32 dest_idx_unmasked)
dma_unmap_single(bp->sdev->dma_dev, mapping,
RX_PKT_BUF_SZ, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(bp->dev, RX_PKT_BUF_SZ, GFP_ATOMIC|GFP_DMA);
skb = alloc_skb(RX_PKT_BUF_SZ, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
if (skb == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
mapping = dma_map_single(bp->sdev->dma_dev, skb->data,
......@@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t b44_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
dma_unmap_single(bp->sdev->dma_dev, mapping, len,
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
bounce_skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(dev, len, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
bounce_skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
if (!bounce_skb)
goto err_out;
......
......@@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ static int dma_tx_fragment(struct b43legacy_dmaring *ring,
meta->dmaaddr = map_descbuffer(ring, skb->data, skb->len, 1);
/* create a bounce buffer in zone_dma on mapping failure. */
if (b43legacy_dma_mapping_error(ring, meta->dmaaddr, skb->len, 1)) {
bounce_skb = __dev_alloc_skb(skb->len, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
bounce_skb = alloc_skb(skb->len, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
if (!bounce_skb) {
ring->current_slot = old_top_slot;
ring->used_slots = old_used_slots;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment