Commit ad2088ca authored by Zachary Amsden's avatar Zachary Amsden Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

KVM: x86: Fix a possible backwards warp of kvmclock

(backported from commit 1d5f066e)


Kernel time, which advances in discrete steps may progress much slower
than TSC.  As a result, when kvmclock is adjusted to a new base, the
apparent time to the guest, which runs at a much higher, nsec scaled
rate based on the current TSC, may have already been observed to have
a larger value (kernel_ns + scaled tsc) than the value to which we are
setting it (kernel_ns + 0).

We must instead compute the clock as potentially observed by the guest
for kernel_ns to make sure it does not go backwards.
Signed-off-by: default avatarZachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714335Signed-off-by: default avatarSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarStefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
parent 64c8f7b9
...@@ -357,6 +357,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { ...@@ -357,6 +357,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
struct page *time_page; struct page *time_page;
bool singlestep; /* guest is single stepped by KVM */ bool singlestep; /* guest is single stepped by KVM */
u64 last_guest_tsc;
u64 last_kernel_ns;
bool nmi_pending; bool nmi_pending;
bool nmi_injected; bool nmi_injected;
......
...@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ ...@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
#include <asm/desc.h> #include <asm/desc.h>
#include <asm/mtrr.h> #include <asm/mtrr.h>
#include <asm/mce.h> #include <asm/mce.h>
#include <asm/pvclock.h>
#define MAX_IO_MSRS 256 #define MAX_IO_MSRS 256
#define CR0_RESERVED_BITS \ #define CR0_RESERVED_BITS \
...@@ -633,6 +634,8 @@ static void kvm_write_guest_time(struct kvm_vcpu *v) ...@@ -633,6 +634,8 @@ static void kvm_write_guest_time(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu = &v->arch; struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu = &v->arch;
void *shared_kaddr; void *shared_kaddr;
unsigned long this_tsc_khz; unsigned long this_tsc_khz;
s64 kernel_ns, max_kernel_ns;
u64 tsc_timestamp;
if ((!vcpu->time_page)) if ((!vcpu->time_page))
return; return;
...@@ -646,15 +649,51 @@ static void kvm_write_guest_time(struct kvm_vcpu *v) ...@@ -646,15 +649,51 @@ static void kvm_write_guest_time(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
/* Keep irq disabled to prevent changes to the clock */ /* Keep irq disabled to prevent changes to the clock */
local_irq_save(flags); local_irq_save(flags);
kvm_get_msr(v, MSR_IA32_TSC, &vcpu->hv_clock.tsc_timestamp); kvm_get_msr(v, MSR_IA32_TSC, &tsc_timestamp);
ktime_get_ts(&ts); ktime_get_ts(&ts);
monotonic_to_bootbased(&ts); monotonic_to_bootbased(&ts);
kernel_ns = timespec_to_ns(&ts);
local_irq_restore(flags); local_irq_restore(flags);
/*
* Time as measured by the TSC may go backwards when resetting the base
* tsc_timestamp. The reason for this is that the TSC resolution is
* higher than the resolution of the other clock scales. Thus, many
* possible measurments of the TSC correspond to one measurement of any
* other clock, and so a spread of values is possible. This is not a
* problem for the computation of the nanosecond clock; with TSC rates
* around 1GHZ, there can only be a few cycles which correspond to one
* nanosecond value, and any path through this code will inevitably
* take longer than that. However, with the kernel_ns value itself,
* the precision may be much lower, down to HZ granularity. If the
* first sampling of TSC against kernel_ns ends in the low part of the
* range, and the second in the high end of the range, we can get:
*
* (TSC - offset_low) * S + kns_old > (TSC - offset_high) * S + kns_new
*
* As the sampling errors potentially range in the thousands of cycles,
* it is possible such a time value has already been observed by the
* guest. To protect against this, we must compute the system time as
* observed by the guest and ensure the new system time is greater.
*/
max_kernel_ns = 0;
if (vcpu->hv_clock.tsc_timestamp && vcpu->last_guest_tsc) {
max_kernel_ns = vcpu->last_guest_tsc -
vcpu->hv_clock.tsc_timestamp;
max_kernel_ns = pvclock_scale_delta(max_kernel_ns,
vcpu->hv_clock.tsc_to_system_mul,
vcpu->hv_clock.tsc_shift);
max_kernel_ns += vcpu->last_kernel_ns;
}
if (max_kernel_ns > kernel_ns)
kernel_ns = max_kernel_ns;
/* With all the info we got, fill in the values */ /* With all the info we got, fill in the values */
vcpu->hv_clock.system_time = ts.tv_nsec + vcpu->hv_clock.tsc_timestamp = tsc_timestamp;
(NSEC_PER_SEC * (u64)ts.tv_sec) + v->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset; vcpu->hv_clock.system_time = kernel_ns + v->kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset;
vcpu->last_kernel_ns = kernel_ns;
/* /*
* The interface expects us to write an even number signaling that the * The interface expects us to write an even number signaling that the
...@@ -3695,6 +3734,8 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run) ...@@ -3695,6 +3734,8 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run)
kvm_x86_ops->prepare_guest_switch(vcpu); kvm_x86_ops->prepare_guest_switch(vcpu);
kvm_load_guest_fpu(vcpu); kvm_load_guest_fpu(vcpu);
kvm_get_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_TSC, &vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc);
local_irq_disable(); local_irq_disable();
clear_bit(KVM_REQ_KICK, &vcpu->requests); clear_bit(KVM_REQ_KICK, &vcpu->requests);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment