Commit b03671a8 authored by Harvey Harrison's avatar Harvey Harrison Committed by Jaroslav Kysela

ALSA: ac97_patch make functions static

Only used in ac97_codec by including ac97_patch.c directly, effectively static

Found by sparse:
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c:3551:5: warning: symbol 'patch_vt1617a' was not declared. Should it be static?
sound/pci/ac97/ac97_patch.c:3767:5: warning: symbol 'patch_vt1618' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: default avatarHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
parent f4446ea0
...@@ -3548,7 +3548,7 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new snd_ac97_controls_vt1617a[] = { ...@@ -3548,7 +3548,7 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new snd_ac97_controls_vt1617a[] = {
}, },
}; };
int patch_vt1617a(struct snd_ac97 * ac97) static int patch_vt1617a(struct snd_ac97 * ac97)
{ {
int err = 0; int err = 0;
int val; int val;
...@@ -3764,7 +3764,7 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new snd_ac97_controls_vt1618[] = { ...@@ -3764,7 +3764,7 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new snd_ac97_controls_vt1618[] = {
} }
}; };
int patch_vt1618(struct snd_ac97 *ac97) static int patch_vt1618(struct snd_ac97 *ac97)
{ {
return patch_build_controls(ac97, snd_ac97_controls_vt1618, return patch_build_controls(ac97, snd_ac97_controls_vt1618,
ARRAY_SIZE(snd_ac97_controls_vt1618)); ARRAY_SIZE(snd_ac97_controls_vt1618));
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment