perf/x86: Fix exclusion of BTS and LBR for Goldmont

An earlier patch allowed enabling PT and LBR at the same
time on Goldmont. However it also allowed enabling BTS and LBR
at the same time, which is still not supported. Fix this by
bypassing the check only for PT.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: alexander.shishkin@intel.com
Cc: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: ccbebba4 ("perf/x86/intel/pt: Bypass PT vs. LBR exclusivity if the core supports it")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161209001417.4713-1-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

arch/x86/events/core.c

@@ -365,7 +365,11 @@ int x86_add_exclusive(unsigned int what)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist)
+	/*
+	 * When lbr_pt_coexist we allow PT to coexist with either LBR or BTS.
+	 * LBR and BTS are still mutually exclusive.
+	 */
+	if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist && what == x86_lbr_exclusive_pt)
 		return 0;
 
 	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what])) {
@@ -388,7 +392,7 @@ int x86_add_exclusive(unsigned int what)
 
 void x86_del_exclusive(unsigned int what)
 {
-	if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist)
+	if (x86_pmu.lbr_pt_coexist && what == x86_lbr_exclusive_pt)
 		return;
 
 	atomic_dec(&x86_pmu.lbr_exclusive[what]);

arch/x86/events/perf_event.h

@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	u64		lbr_sel_mask;		   /* LBR_SELECT valid bits */
 	const int	*lbr_sel_map;		   /* lbr_select mappings */
 	bool		lbr_double_abort;	   /* duplicated lbr aborts */
-	bool		lbr_pt_coexist;		   /* LBR may coexist with PT */
+	bool		lbr_pt_coexist;		   /* (LBR|BTS) may coexist with PT */
 
 	/*
 	 * Intel PT/LBR/BTS are exclusive