timers: Clarify usleep_range() function comment
Update the usleep_range() function comment to make it clear that it can only be used in non-atomic context. Previously we claimed usleep_range() was a drop-in replacement for udelay() where wakeup is flexible. But that's only true in non-atomic contexts, where it's possible to sleep instead of delay. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160531212302.28502.44995.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.comSigned-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment