Commit b6b561c3 authored by Kevin Lo's avatar Kevin Lo Committed by John W. Linville

rt2x00: rt2800lib: remove duplicate rf_vals for RF3053

lready have rf_vals_3x with same values.  Hence rf_vals_3053 is removed
in this patch.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKevin Lo <kevlo@kevlo.org>
Acked-by: default avatarPaul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: default avatarStanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
parent 7122e660
...@@ -7246,7 +7246,7 @@ static const struct rf_channel rf_vals[] = { ...@@ -7246,7 +7246,7 @@ static const struct rf_channel rf_vals[] = {
/* /*
* RF value list for rt3xxx * RF value list for rt3xxx
* Supports: 2.4 GHz (all) & 5.2 GHz (RF3052) * Supports: 2.4 GHz (all) & 5.2 GHz (RF3052 & RF3053)
*/ */
static const struct rf_channel rf_vals_3x[] = { static const struct rf_channel rf_vals_3x[] = {
{1, 241, 2, 2 }, {1, 241, 2, 2 },
...@@ -7442,72 +7442,6 @@ static const struct rf_channel rf_vals_5592_xtal40[] = { ...@@ -7442,72 +7442,6 @@ static const struct rf_channel rf_vals_5592_xtal40[] = {
{196, 83, 0, 12, 1}, {196, 83, 0, 12, 1},
}; };
static const struct rf_channel rf_vals_3053[] = {
/* Channel, N, R, K */
{1, 241, 2, 2},
{2, 241, 2, 7},
{3, 242, 2, 2},
{4, 242, 2, 7},
{5, 243, 2, 2},
{6, 243, 2, 7},
{7, 244, 2, 2},
{8, 244, 2, 7},
{9, 245, 2, 2},
{10, 245, 2, 7},
{11, 246, 2, 2},
{12, 246, 2, 7},
{13, 247, 2, 2},
{14, 248, 2, 4},
{36, 0x56, 0, 4},
{38, 0x56, 0, 6},
{40, 0x56, 0, 8},
{44, 0x57, 0, 0},
{46, 0x57, 0, 2},
{48, 0x57, 0, 4},
{52, 0x57, 0, 8},
{54, 0x57, 0, 10},
{56, 0x58, 0, 0},
{60, 0x58, 0, 4},
{62, 0x58, 0, 6},
{64, 0x58, 0, 8},
{100, 0x5B, 0, 8},
{102, 0x5B, 0, 10},
{104, 0x5C, 0, 0},
{108, 0x5C, 0, 4},
{110, 0x5C, 0, 6},
{112, 0x5C, 0, 8},
/* NOTE: Channel 114 has been removed intentionally.
* The EEPROM contains no TX power values for that,
* and it is disabled in the vendor driver as well.
*/
{116, 0x5D, 0, 0},
{118, 0x5D, 0, 2},
{120, 0x5D, 0, 4},
{124, 0x5D, 0, 8},
{126, 0x5D, 0, 10},
{128, 0x5E, 0, 0},
{132, 0x5E, 0, 4},
{134, 0x5E, 0, 6},
{136, 0x5E, 0, 8},
{140, 0x5F, 0, 0},
{149, 0x5F, 0, 9},
{151, 0x5F, 0, 11},
{153, 0x60, 0, 1},
{157, 0x60, 0, 5},
{159, 0x60, 0, 7},
{161, 0x60, 0, 9},
{165, 0x61, 0, 1},
{167, 0x61, 0, 3},
{169, 0x61, 0, 5},
{171, 0x61, 0, 7},
{173, 0x61, 0, 9},
};
static int rt2800_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev) static int rt2800_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
{ {
struct hw_mode_spec *spec = &rt2x00dev->spec; struct hw_mode_spec *spec = &rt2x00dev->spec;
...@@ -7597,14 +7531,11 @@ static int rt2800_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev) ...@@ -7597,14 +7531,11 @@ static int rt2800_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF5392)) { rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF5392)) {
spec->num_channels = 14; spec->num_channels = 14;
spec->channels = rf_vals_3x; spec->channels = rf_vals_3x;
} else if (rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF3052)) { } else if (rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF3052) ||
rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF3053)) {
spec->supported_bands |= SUPPORT_BAND_5GHZ; spec->supported_bands |= SUPPORT_BAND_5GHZ;
spec->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rf_vals_3x); spec->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rf_vals_3x);
spec->channels = rf_vals_3x; spec->channels = rf_vals_3x;
} else if (rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF3053)) {
spec->supported_bands |= SUPPORT_BAND_5GHZ;
spec->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rf_vals_3053);
spec->channels = rf_vals_3053;
} else if (rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF5592)) { } else if (rt2x00_rf(rt2x00dev, RF5592)) {
spec->supported_bands |= SUPPORT_BAND_5GHZ; spec->supported_bands |= SUPPORT_BAND_5GHZ;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment