Commit bae94dc3 authored by Mauro Carvalho Chehab's avatar Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] cx231xx-417: Fix a gcc warning

gcc didn't like to have i++ inside a complex operation:

drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c: In function ‘cx231xx_load_firmware’:
drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:1059: warning: operation on ‘i’ may be undefined
drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:1061: warning: operation on ‘i’ may be undefined
drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-417.c:1063: warning: operation on ‘i’ may be undefined

Btw, I agree with gcc, as we're using i and i++ at the same operation and,
depending on how optimization may occur, it may produce a wrong code.

While here, fix CodingStyle issues on the changed code.
Acked-by: default avatarSri Deevi <Srinivasa.Deevi@conexant.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
parent 955e6ed8
......@@ -1053,16 +1053,15 @@ static int cx231xx_load_firmware(struct cx231xx *dev)
/*download the firmware by ep5-out*/
for (frame = 0; frame < (int)(CX231xx_FIRM_IMAGE_SIZE*20/_buffer_size);
frame++) {
frame++) {
for (i = 0; i < _buffer_size; i++) {
*(p_buffer+i) =
(u8)(*(p_fw+(frame*128*8+(i++/4))) & 0x000000FF);
*(p_buffer+i) =
(u8)((*(p_fw+(frame*128*8+(i++/4))) & 0x0000FF00)>>8);
*(p_buffer+i) =
(u8)((*(p_fw+(frame*128*8+(i++/4))) & 0x00FF0000)>>16);
*(p_buffer+i) =
(u8)((*(p_fw+(frame*128*8+(i/4))) & 0xFF000000)>>24);
*(p_buffer + i) = (u8)(*(p_fw + (frame * 128 * 8 + (i / 4))) & 0x000000FF);
i++;
*(p_buffer + i) = (u8)((*(p_fw + (frame * 128 * 8 + (i / 4))) & 0x0000FF00) >> 8);
i++;
*(p_buffer + i) = (u8)((*(p_fw + (frame * 128 * 8 + (i / 4))) & 0x00FF0000) >> 16);
i++;
*(p_buffer + i) = (u8)((*(p_fw + (frame * 128 * 8 + (i / 4))) & 0xFF000000) >> 24);
}
cx231xx_ep5_bulkout(dev, p_buffer, _buffer_size);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment