Commit bc22de9b authored by Jiri Olsa's avatar Jiri Olsa Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf stat: Display time in precision based on std deviation

Ingo suggested to display elapsed time for multirun workload (perf stat
-e) with precision based on the precision of the standard deviation.

In his own words:

  > This output is a slightly bit misleading:

  >  Performance counter stats for 'make -j128' (10 runs):
  >      27.988995256 seconds time elapsed                  ( +-  0.39% )

  > The 9 significant digits in the result, while only 1 is valid, suggests accuracy
  > where none exists.

  > It would be better if 'perf stat' would display elapsed time with a precision
  > adjusted to stddev, it should display at most 2 more significant digits than
  > the stddev inaccuracy.

  > I.e. in the above case 0.39% is 0.109, so we only have accuracy for 1 digit, and
  > so we should only display 3:

  >        27.988 seconds time elapsed                       ( +-  0.39% )

Plus a suggestion about the output, which is small enough and connected
with the above change that I merged both changes together.

  > Small output style nit - I think it would be nice if with --repeat the stddev was
  > also displayed in absolute values, besides percentage:
  >
  >       27.988 +- 0.109 seconds time elapsed   ( +- 0.39% )

The output is now:

   Performance counter stats for './perf bench sched pipe' (5 runs):
   SNIP
           13.3667 +- 0.0256 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  0.19% )
Suggested-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180423090823.32309-7-jolsa@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent 58247297
...@@ -1764,19 +1764,37 @@ static void print_header(int argc, const char **argv) ...@@ -1764,19 +1764,37 @@ static void print_header(int argc, const char **argv)
} }
} }
static int get_precision(double num)
{
if (num > 1)
return 0;
return lround(ceil(-log10(num)));
}
static void print_footer(void) static void print_footer(void)
{ {
double avg = avg_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats) / NSEC_PER_SEC;
FILE *output = stat_config.output; FILE *output = stat_config.output;
int n; int n;
if (!null_run) if (!null_run)
fprintf(output, "\n"); fprintf(output, "\n");
fprintf(output, " %17.9f seconds time elapsed",
avg_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats) / NSEC_PER_SEC); if (run_count == 1) {
if (run_count > 1) { fprintf(output, " %17.9f seconds time elapsed", avg);
fprintf(output, " "); } else {
print_noise_pct(stddev_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats), double sd = stddev_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats) / NSEC_PER_SEC;
avg_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats)); /*
* Display at most 2 more significant
* digits than the stddev inaccuracy.
*/
int precision = get_precision(sd) + 2;
fprintf(output, " %17.*f +- %.*f seconds time elapsed",
precision, avg, precision, sd);
print_noise_pct(sd, avg);
} }
fprintf(output, "\n\n"); fprintf(output, "\n\n");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment