Commit be6acbd7 authored by Vegard Nossum's avatar Vegard Nossum Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: check for extents that wrap around

commit f70749ca upstream.

An extent with lblock = 4294967295 and len = 1 will pass the
ext4_valid_extent() test:

	ext4_lblk_t last = lblock + len - 1;

	if (len == 0 || lblock > last)
		return 0;

since last = 4294967295 + 1 - 1 = 4294967295. This would later trigger
the BUG_ON(es->es_lblk + es->es_len < es->es_lblk) in ext4_es_end().

We can simplify it by removing the - 1 altogether and changing the test
to use lblock + len <= lblock, since now if len = 0, then lblock + 0 ==
lblock and it fails, and if len > 0 then lblock + len > lblock in order
to pass (i.e. it doesn't overflow).

Fixes: 5946d089 ("ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()")
Fixes: 2f974865 ("ext4: check for zero length extent explicitly")
Cc: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPhil Turnbull <phil.turnbull@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 29c8e059
......@@ -359,9 +359,13 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_extent *ext)
ext4_fsblk_t block = ext4_ext_pblock(ext);
int len = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext);
ext4_lblk_t lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block);
ext4_lblk_t last = lblock + len - 1;
if (len == 0 || lblock > last)
/*
* We allow neither:
* - zero length
* - overflow/wrap-around
*/
if (lblock + len <= lblock)
return 0;
return ext4_data_block_valid(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), block, len);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment