Commit c3d43361 authored by Tarun Vyas's avatar Tarun Vyas Committed by Dhinakaran Pandiyan

drm/i915: Use crtc_state->has_psr instead of CAN_PSR for pipe update

In commit "drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank
evasion", the idea was to limit the PSR IDLE checks when PSR is
actually supported. While CAN_PSR does do that check, it doesn't
applies on a per-crtc basis. crtc_state->has_psr is a more granular
check that only applies to pipe(s) that have PSR enabled.

Without the has_psr check, we end up waiting on the eDP transcoder's
PSR_STATUS register irrespective of whether the pipe being updated is
driving it or not.

v2: Remove unnecessary parantheses, make checkpatch happy.

v3: Move the has_psr check to intel_psr_wait_for_idle and commit
    message changes (DK).

v4: Derive dev_priv from intel_crtc_state (DK)

v5: Commit message changes to reflect the HW behavior (DK)

Fixes: a6089879 ("drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank evasion")
Reviewed-by: default avatarDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180712053323.26266-1-tarun.vyas@intel.com
parent d5dc0f43
...@@ -1922,7 +1922,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, ...@@ -1922,7 +1922,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug); void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug);
void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 psr_iir); void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 psr_iir);
void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state);
/* intel_runtime_pm.c */ /* intel_runtime_pm.c */
int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *); int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *);
......
...@@ -717,11 +717,16 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, ...@@ -717,11 +717,16 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work); cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work);
} }
int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
{ {
struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(new_crtc_state->base.crtc);
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
i915_reg_t reg; i915_reg_t reg;
u32 mask; u32 mask;
if (!new_crtc_state->has_psr)
return 0;
/* /*
* The sole user right now is intel_pipe_update_start(), * The sole user right now is intel_pipe_update_start(),
* which won't race with psr_enable/disable, which is * which won't race with psr_enable/disable, which is
......
...@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state) ...@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
* VBL interrupts will start the PSR exit and prevent a PSR * VBL interrupts will start the PSR exit and prevent a PSR
* re-entry as well. * re-entry as well.
*/ */
if (CAN_PSR(dev_priv) && intel_psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv)) if (intel_psr_wait_for_idle(new_crtc_state))
DRM_ERROR("PSR idle timed out, atomic update may fail\n"); DRM_ERROR("PSR idle timed out, atomic update may fail\n");
local_irq_disable(); local_irq_disable();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment