Commit c6011553 authored by Vineet Gupta's avatar Vineet Gupta

ARC: [ASID] activate_mm() == switch_mm()

ASID allocation changes/2

Use the fact that switch_mm() and activate_mm() are exactly same code
now while acknowledging the semantical difference in comment
Signed-off-by: default avatarVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
parent 3daa48d1
......@@ -156,6 +156,15 @@ static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
get_new_mmu_context(next);
}
/*
* Called at the time of execve() to get a new ASID
* Note the subtlety here: get_new_mmu_context() behaves differently here
* vs. in switch_mm(). Here it always returns a new ASID, because mm has
* an unallocated "initial" value, while in latter, it moves to a new ASID,
* only if it was unallocated
*/
#define activate_mm(prev, next) switch_mm(prev, next, NULL)
static inline void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
unsigned long flags;
......@@ -177,17 +186,6 @@ static inline void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
*/
#define deactivate_mm(tsk, mm) do { } while (0)
static inline void activate_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
write_aux_reg(ARC_REG_SCRATCH_DATA0, next->pgd);
#endif
/* Unconditionally get a new ASID */
get_new_mmu_context(next);
}
#define enter_lazy_tlb(mm, tsk)
#endif /* __ASM_ARC_MMU_CONTEXT_H */
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment