Commit c8260db5 authored by Alexandre Belloni's avatar Alexandre Belloni Committed by Nicolas Ferre

ARM: at91: fix ramc standby function registration

After the for_each_matching_node loop, we end up with a null value for np. Then,
of_match_node() is not matching anything and we can't register the standby
function and "ramc no standby function available" is printed.

Fix that by selecting the first available standby function. For now,
at91_pm_set_standby doesn't support multiple different standby functions and no
existing SoCs have different RAM controllers.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
parent f55df0d6
......@@ -343,25 +343,28 @@ static void at91_dt_ramc(void)
struct device_node *np;
const struct of_device_id *of_id;
int idx = 0;
const void *standby = NULL;
for_each_matching_node(np, ramc_ids) {
for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, ramc_ids, &of_id) {
at91_ramc_base[idx] = of_iomap(np, 0);
if (!at91_ramc_base[idx])
panic(pr_fmt("unable to map ramc[%d] cpu registers\n"), idx);
if (!standby)
standby = of_id->data;
idx++;
}
if (!idx)
panic(pr_fmt("unable to find compatible ram controller node in dtb\n"));
of_id = of_match_node(ramc_ids, np);
if (!of_id) {
if (!standby) {
pr_warn("ramc no standby function available\n");
return;
}
at91_pm_set_standby(of_id->data);
at91_pm_set_standby(standby);
}
void __init at91rm9200_dt_initialize(void)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment