Commit c9e58fb2 authored by Bob Peterson's avatar Bob Peterson

gfs2: write revokes should traverse sd_ail1_list in reverse

All the other functions that deal with the sd_ail_list run the list
from the tail back to the head, iow, in reverse. We should do the
same while writing revokes, otherwise we might miss removing entries
properly from the list when we hit the limit of how many revokes we
can write at one time (based on block size, which determines how
many block pointers will fit in the revoke block).
Signed-off-by: default avatarBob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
parent 0ddeded4
......@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ void gfs2_write_revokes(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
gfs2_ail1_empty(sdp);
spin_lock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
list_for_each_entry(tr, &sdp->sd_ail1_list, tr_list) {
list_for_each_entry_reverse(tr, &sdp->sd_ail1_list, tr_list) {
list_for_each_entry(bd, &tr->tr_ail2_list, bd_ail_st_list) {
if (list_empty(&bd->bd_list)) {
have_revokes = 1;
......@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ void gfs2_write_revokes(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
}
gfs2_log_lock(sdp);
spin_lock(&sdp->sd_ail_lock);
list_for_each_entry(tr, &sdp->sd_ail1_list, tr_list) {
list_for_each_entry_reverse(tr, &sdp->sd_ail1_list, tr_list) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(bd, tmp, &tr->tr_ail2_list, bd_ail_st_list) {
if (max_revokes == 0)
goto out_of_blocks;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment