Commit d38a71c5 authored by Marc Zyngier's avatar Marc Zyngier

irqchip/gic-v3-its: Change initialization ordering for LPIs

We currently initialize the LPIs (and the ITS) fairly early, even
before the SMP support and the CPU interface. This is a bit odd
(as LPIs are not exactly crutial for the early boot process),
and is going to cause issues when reorganizing the probing code.

Let's move this initialization later.
Reviewed-by: default avatarJulien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Tested-by: default avatarJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Tested-by: default avatarBhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
Tested-by: default avatarLei Zhang <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
parent a23d3bb0
......@@ -653,7 +653,9 @@ early_param("irqchip.gicv3_nolpi", gicv3_nolpi_cfg);
static int gic_dist_supports_lpis(void)
{
return !!(readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_TYPER) & GICD_TYPER_LPIS) && !gicv3_nolpi;
return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) &&
!!(readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_TYPER) & GICD_TYPER_LPIS) &&
!gicv3_nolpi);
}
static void gic_cpu_init(void)
......@@ -673,10 +675,6 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void)
gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp);
/* Give LPIs a spin */
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis())
its_cpu_init();
/* initialise system registers */
gic_cpu_sys_reg_init();
}
......@@ -689,6 +687,10 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void)
static int gic_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
{
gic_cpu_init();
if (gic_dist_supports_lpis())
its_cpu_init();
return 0;
}
......@@ -1127,14 +1129,16 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
gic_update_vlpi_properties();
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_GIC_V3_ITS) && gic_dist_supports_lpis())
its_init(handle, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain);
gic_smp_init();
gic_dist_init();
gic_cpu_init();
gic_cpu_pm_init();
if (gic_dist_supports_lpis()) {
its_init(handle, &gic_data.rdists, gic_data.domain);
its_cpu_init();
}
return 0;
out_free:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment