netlink: don't hold mutex in rcu callback when releasing mmapd ring
commit 0470eb99 upstream. Kirill A. Shutemov says: This simple test-case trigers few locking asserts in kernel: int main(int argc, char **argv) { unsigned int block_size = 16 * 4096; struct nl_mmap_req req = { .nm_block_size = block_size, .nm_block_nr = 64, .nm_frame_size = 16384, .nm_frame_nr = 64 * block_size / 16384, }; unsigned int ring_size; int fd; fd = socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, NETLINK_GENERIC); if (setsockopt(fd, SOL_NETLINK, NETLINK_RX_RING, &req, sizeof(req)) < 0) exit(1); if (setsockopt(fd, SOL_NETLINK, NETLINK_TX_RING, &req, sizeof(req)) < 0) exit(1); ring_size = req.nm_block_nr * req.nm_block_size; mmap(NULL, 2 * ring_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); return 0; } +++ exited with 0 +++ BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at /home/kas/git/public/linux-mm/kernel/locking/mutex.c:616 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1, name: init 3 locks held by init/1: #0: (reboot_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81080959>] SyS_reboot+0xa9/0x220 #1: ((reboot_notifier_list).rwsem){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8107f379>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x39/0x70 #2: (rcu_callback){......}, at: [<ffffffff810d32e0>] rcu_do_batch.isra.49+0x160/0x10c0 Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff8145365f>] __delay+0xf/0x20 CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.1.0-00009-gbddf4c4818e0 #253 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS Debian-1.8.2-1 04/01/2014 ffff88017b3d8000 ffff88027bc03c38 ffffffff81929ceb 0000000000000102 0000000000000000 ffff88027bc03c68 ffffffff81085a9d 0000000000000002 ffffffff81ca2a20 0000000000000268 0000000000000000 ffff88027bc03c98 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff81929ceb>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b [<ffffffff81085a9d>] ___might_sleep+0x16d/0x270 [<ffffffff81085bed>] __might_sleep+0x4d/0x90 [<ffffffff8192e96f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2f/0x430 [<ffffffff81932fed>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x5d/0x80 [<ffffffff81464143>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20 [<ffffffff8182fc3d>] netlink_set_ring+0x1ed/0x350 [<ffffffff8182e000>] ? netlink_undo_bind+0x70/0x70 [<ffffffff8182fe20>] netlink_sock_destruct+0x80/0x150 [<ffffffff817e484d>] __sk_free+0x1d/0x160 [<ffffffff817e49a9>] sk_free+0x19/0x20 [..] Cong Wang says: We can't hold mutex lock in a rcu callback, [..] Thomas Graf says: The socket should be dead at this point. It might be simpler to add a netlink_release_ring() function which doesn't require locking at all. Reported-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Diagnosed-by: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com> Suggested-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment