Commit dba9bf0a authored by Arnd Bergmann's avatar Arnd Bergmann Committed by Sam Ravnborg

drm: panel: fix excessive stack usage in td028ttec1_prepare

With gcc -O3 in combination with the structleak plug, the compiler can
inline very aggressively, leading to rather large stack usage:

drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c: In function 'td028ttec1_prepare':
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c:233:1: error: the frame size of 2768 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
 }

Marking jbt_reg_write_*() as noinline avoids the case where
multiple instances of this function get inlined into the same
stack frame and each one adds a copy of 'tx_buf'.

The compiler is clearly making some bad decisions here, but I
did not open a new bug report as this only happens in combination
with the structleak plugin.

This fixes mmtom ("init/Kconfig: enable -O3 for all arches")

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a3jAnFZA3GFRtdYdg1-i-oih3pOQzkkrK-X3BGsFrMiZQ@mail.gmail.com/Signed-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> [fix indent]
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200108135116.3687988-1-arnd@arndb.de
parent 0980939d
......@@ -86,7 +86,12 @@ struct td028ttec1_panel {
#define to_td028ttec1_device(p) container_of(p, struct td028ttec1_panel, panel)
static int jbt_ret_write_0(struct td028ttec1_panel *lcd, u8 reg, int *err)
/*
* noinline_for_stack so we don't get multiple copies of tx_buf
* on the stack in case of gcc-plugin-structleak
*/
static int noinline_for_stack
jbt_ret_write_0(struct td028ttec1_panel *lcd, u8 reg, int *err)
{
struct spi_device *spi = lcd->spi;
u16 tx_buf = JBT_COMMAND | reg;
......@@ -105,8 +110,9 @@ static int jbt_ret_write_0(struct td028ttec1_panel *lcd, u8 reg, int *err)
return ret;
}
static int jbt_reg_write_1(struct td028ttec1_panel *lcd,
u8 reg, u8 data, int *err)
static int noinline_for_stack
jbt_reg_write_1(struct td028ttec1_panel *lcd,
u8 reg, u8 data, int *err)
{
struct spi_device *spi = lcd->spi;
u16 tx_buf[2];
......@@ -128,8 +134,9 @@ static int jbt_reg_write_1(struct td028ttec1_panel *lcd,
return ret;
}
static int jbt_reg_write_2(struct td028ttec1_panel *lcd,
u8 reg, u16 data, int *err)
static int noinline_for_stack
jbt_reg_write_2(struct td028ttec1_panel *lcd,
u8 reg, u16 data, int *err)
{
struct spi_device *spi = lcd->spi;
u16 tx_buf[3];
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment